Price would be useful to have. It looks like the front page asks non-free spaces to mention that clearly in the description, but browsing through, the descriptions are pretty vague on that. Clicking through to the sites, it looks like they range from a person or small company with some spare desks they're willing to let you use free, to dedicated commercial spaces charging $20-30/day to rent. Those are pretty different categories, and I doubt I'd normally be looking for both simultaneously.
Just a note to anyone visiting the site. We are currently having issues with the mass demand of visits and going over our Google API request limit.
Currently in a team Skype call trying to resolve the issue. You can still see all the workplaces available via the "Workplaces" link. Search and creating workplaces are the pages that are affected.
Thanks to everyone for checking us out. We will keep @desksnearme updated with the progress.
A few weeks ago I was wondering about AirBnB for offices. Wasn't sure if it would be massively successful, but thought it might make a quality side project. Good to see someone's built it and their execution is decent.
The idea is cute, but I assume there's some kind of QC available for verifying links? Otherwise you're literally begging to be overwhelmed by griefers at this stage.
Yup, Keith created that. Its a test record. Because we created this for a coding competition we need people to be able to judge the site and make bookings without actually making a real life booking.
The search function does not work for me. I typed in 'Baltimore' and received zero results. But when I browsed the listings I came upon Beehive Baltimore ( http://desksnear.me/workplaces/32-beehive-baltimore).
Great! As someone who floats from cafe to bedroom to cafe throughout the week, this is a service i have been looking for. Impressed that you already have a location in Melbourne, Australia in your database, i'll probably go check them out.
We've been getting a lot of really great feedback from this site and twitter and we've been taking it all under consideration. Feel free to check out http://blog.desksnear.me for some updates.
And guys, if you love the idea and want to see the site around, please vote for us at http://railsrumble.com/teams/the-rad-warlike-annex when public voting opens on Oct 21! The prizes will keep us alive for a long type!
Would it be beyond the scope of this to list temporary coworking spaces? For example there's a couple of places in my area that run an open office either weekly or monthly and it might be good to have a listing of those sorts of spaces.
It'd also be good to link in with the coworking visa that a number of coworking spaces are members of. And in fact it'd be good to work more closely with coworking spaces in general via the coworking wiki.
Great initiative! AirBnB for desks is really needed. Would be great to choose one day where I'd like to work :)
I think a lot of works needs to be done on UI. You don't need location from browser, you can just show desks within my city (get that from ip). And no facebook connect?
Watch how AirBnB did it. Start slow and from few cities then generalize it to other.
Please please please, let me create an account without having to jump through silly hoops like OpenID or Twitter. Your little website just isn't compelling enough for me to do that.
I want to try it though, just to give you some feedback. Please let me create a simple login so that I can do so.
Yup we will be expanding the site soon. We built the site in 48 hours for the Rails Rumble competition. We kept it light as we could. After the judging and voting we will be adding in more features and options for login :)
Although we think using Twitter or OAuth is the easiest way. 1 Auth and your email address, thats it.
How could implementing OpenID and OAuth for Twitter be faster to implement than a User table? Certainly you've built web apps before, and therefore have a login workflow that you can rip out and drop into a new site in the first 5 minutes of development?
One other thing you're missing is that as a new user of your thing, I don't trust you enough to hand across my twitter username or openID. I'm more than happy to create a throwaway account with you, but you're certainly not going to get any information that links my profile with you with my profiles elsewhere.
In short, you're losing a significant fraction of your potential userbase. Right now, since this is the moment when you've got more exposure than you'll ever have again. Spend 20 minutes getting a user/pass thing implemented right now, before the sun comes up in the US, and you'll quadruple your first-day signups.
I agree that might be the case but actually the Twitter and OpenID authentication is much safer.
1) When you authenticate with Twitter or OpenID its all done on Twitter or your OpenID providers site. We cant snoop your credentials at all, you dont enter it on our site.
2) Sure authentication is an easy feature but this way we dont need to ask you for your details again, you let us talk to your service and use your existing information.
3) You can kick us off from your Twitter account from Twitter itself and at any time, see Connections section under settings.
Some people might be conscious about us being able to access your Twitter or OpenID information but its mostly available to the world on these services anyway. OAuth (which is the underlying technology behind this authentication) is being used more and more. It's much better and safer for end users, its just that initial hurdle to get mass adoption. Its the end users decision if they trust the site or not. Most people have trusted us today :)
We cant make any changes to the app whilst its being judged, not one line of code. I do agree that we should look at implementing a base user signup sans-OAuth provider but we cant do anything until Rails Rumble has been judged and voted. It was a 48 hour coding competition with many other developers around the world, see www.railsrumble.com
You forget though that you've studied all this stuff. Casual users of your thing won't have.
So when you say "Give me your Twitter username and password", they'll say no. It doesn't matter that it's actually safe. It certainly doesn't sound safe, and that's all that matters.
Argue against it at your own peril. People are comfortable with user/pass.
Lots of sites use Facebook Connect because it actually drives signups.
Where are you basing your argument that people do not actually want to give their twitter username and password?
In my experience, a lot of casual users do not actually care. We had an email inviter that was used frequently where people actually have to give out their Gmail/Yahoo/Hotmail credentials.
You may be comfortable with user/pass but do not make the assumption that the rest of the world are. You may think you're mainstream but you're probably not.
You're blowing up a straw man. Quite a few people may actually have an active Twitter session and thus no active password entry even occurs. Open it up to Facebook Connect and it's more of the same.
You're comfortable with new user/pass and it doesn't sound safe to you.
I see what you guys mean. Hopefully when we can add features agin we'll able to implement these things. We had FB connect, but took it out because we didnt have time to test it enough. We also took out username/password auth because we felt it would complicate things - perhaps not?
Hey, cut them some slack. This is for a weekend competition and if they think it is faster for them to implement OpenId and Twitter OAuth, it's their choice.
Give them the benefit of the doubt that it makes more sense for them to do this than an email/password authentication.
I don't think they are trying a big push for their site right now so they just need to do enough to make it work.
I have something like six Google accounts and a couple of Yahoo accounts and a LiveJournal account and three Twitter accounts and a Facebook account and a bunch of other things that come with OpenIDs.
What I don't have is any idea what OpenID I'm supposed to be using for any given service.
I've tried to just pick one, but the other thing I don't have is a desire to share my login history with any of the above sites, or to link my identity on any of those sites with my identity on New Fly-By-Night Site X without at least trying out Site X, and possibly checking its references too.
Something I do have is an automated workflow for handling usernames and passwords.
In what respect? Because you have to type your password twice the first time you use a particular site with your standard throwaway user/pass combo?
In exchange for that single extra input box, OpenID forces a longer login process every time you use a site. The breakeven point where user/pass starts beating OpenID in terms of convenience happens at visit number two.
I type "stackoverflow.com", and click "login" then "Google", done. This is the same number of clicks as having my browser save my username and password.
Let me provide an equally anecdotal, opposite preference:
Please please please, don't make me create an account on Yet Another Website. Your little website isn't compelling enough for me to do that. I'd much rather just use my Facebook or Twitter account.
(note, this is actually exactly how I feel, I'm not playing devil's advocate.)
OK, this web site has a terrible terrible interface. It uses these nonstandard recessed ovaloids and SOME of them are text fields and others are buttons that take you to other pages. It also tries to establish a HTML5 database without letting me know why.
Phrasing your feedback in a more friendly way will probably result in a better experience for you. For instance:
"I found it a bit confusing that the nav buttons and search box look really similar. Perhaps you could consider restyling them? Also, I keep getting a message from my browser that the site is trying to establish an HTML5 database. Could you explain why? The site doesn't appear to need the database for any of the functionality I've seen."
"The website “http://desksnear.me” is requesting 1 MB of disk space to store “html5 test db” as a database on your disk."
WORKPLACES, SIGN IN and Search By city or address all use novel UI elements of thinly recessed semi-transparent ovaloids, or let's call them extreme rounded rectangles. One is a text field and others are buttons.
Interesting. I wonder if that is Modernizer.js doing that without us realising it. What browser/OS are you using? I'll see if I can replicate it. On Chrome/OS X I never get asked.
Safari/OS X. You have to set "None allowed before asking" in Security if you want to be informed before a db is established. The issue is not that there is a message, it's that it's alarming to have a db set up without an obvious reason for it.
I guess I don't really care though. I am right about the user interface problems, but since your folks are slamming the downvote button as fast as they can in response to useful feedback when you've obviously not done user testing, I don't really care any more about giving good usability feedback. "Someone says our interface has problems! Punish him! He must die!" That's a stupid attitude and your company will fail if it retains it.
We didn't down vote you. I've only had an account for a day and don't even have the ability to down vote. There are only 4 of us so the down votes are coming from OTHER people.
I don't appreciate your attitude and assumptions about how we are responding to your criticism. I'm legitimately trying to understand why the HTML5 database is being created (it is the Modernizer.js script) and I'll be trying to stop it from doing so.
As to the interface issues, I didn't respond to that because I didn't understand your criticism. The other replies to your message have explained it better and I agree, that's a bit confusing. We WILL be looking into that so back off.
I'm not on the team nor did I downvote you but I can understand why others did.
Why are you complaining about "thinly recessed semi-transparent ovaloids"? Is that just another way of saying you don't like the rounded buttons? Why put it that way?
It's pretty intuitive to see which is a search area (obvious magnifying glass icon) and which are navigation buttons. Saying that it's a "terrible terrible" interface because of that is a bit excessive.
Thanks for trying to give feedback to them but try not to be so mean and make accusations like them conspiring to downvote you.
Why is this getting downvoted? It's honest criticism, with actionable things the site owners can do to make their thing better. Just because it's negative doesn't mean it's uncalled for.
Dude Im sorry about that, my bad. Used the HTML5 Boilerplate and didn't remove it before going live. I feel your pain. Iw anted to do a full mobile skin but time ran out.
Yeah sorry about that. It's a known bug. We've got it on our list and hopefully within a week or so (once voting closes on railsrumble.com) we will be fixing that up
Nice work guys - this is excellent. Site feels awesome, and I will definitely be using it rather than having to put a shoutout on Twitter to find coworking spaces.
Looks good too, but I think the guys have captured some of the social elements better with @desksnearme - additionally the availability rollover in desks is awesome.