Sorry, no, that doesn't qualify. The sound quality on SiriusXM is abysmal; it's something like a 32kbps bitrate. FM radio has far better fidelity.
I tried out SiriusXM when I got my new car, because they had a free 6-month trial. It was truly awful (even in a car, which doesn't exactly have a great environment for listening to music), so I quickly gave up on it.
It always sounds better than FM to me. Probably because of a lack of static; It either worked or it didn’t.
I thought you were kidding though, so I looked it up, and Wikipedia[0] confirms it:
> Each two-carrier group broadcast 100 8-kilobit-per-second streams in approximately 4 MHz of radio spectrum. These streams were combined using a patented process to form a variable number of channels using a variety of bitrates. Bandwidth is separated into segments of 4-kilobit-per-second virtual "streams" which are combined to form audio and data "channels" of varying bitrates from 4 to 64 kilobits-per-second.
Wow. I thought they just used satellite internet and streamed from their servers.
Yeah, you're not going to get FM quality from 4kbps, so it's exactly like I said.
It might sound better to you because you're only listening to the channels they allocate the maximum bitrate to (i.e., the most popular ones). I don't listen to pop, so the stuff I tried listening to (hard rock and metal) sounded like total shit.
Here's a test for you: rip your favorite CD into FLAC, then encode this into a bunch of different MP3 or AAC streams of different bitrates. See what they sound like at 32kbps or worse. If that bitrate actually sounds fine to you, you might want to visit an audiologist and get your hearing checked. 64kbps will probably sound OK, depending on the codec (Ogg Vorbis and probably AAC will sound noticeably better than MP3), but nothing is going to sound good at 32 or less.
In short, XM does not have enough spectrum available to stream all those channels at a high-quality bitrate, so they devised this wacky scheme to allow them to broadcast some things at higher bitrates than others. While you don't need a high bitrate for talk radio of course, they also relegate many other music channels to lower bitrates, resulting in poor audio quality. Why would I pay $12/month or whatever for this? These days, if you insist on streaming music, you're better off just using your phone with a high or unlimited data plan and listening to Spotify or similar.
They do stream from satellites; that's why it's called "satellite radio". That doesn't mean they can use as much spectrum as they want; they only get so much spectrum to broadcast in, so they can either have fewer higher-quality channels, or more lower-quality channels, or (what they did) a scheme where different channels can have different quality levels. But of course, they assume that most listeners can't tell the difference between good quality compression and poor quality (too-low bitrate) compression, and aim for more channels to satisfy more diverse tastes.
As an aside, SiriusXM isn't just broadcast from satellites; they also broadcast in cities from terrestrial towers, because in cities the reception from the satellites frequently isn't good (too many tall buildings and tunnels, too much multipath distortion, etc.). This doesn't change the spectrum allocation they're granted though.
I tried out SiriusXM when I got my new car, because they had a free 6-month trial. It was truly awful (even in a car, which doesn't exactly have a great environment for listening to music), so I quickly gave up on it.