They also don't want to let it sound bad, but in essence this is exactly what they are proposing from what I gather.
In a moment of greatness, which we have very few, EU officials specifically disallowed "forward policing".
Perhaps I do have a fundamental misunderstanding and the ambition is indeed to restrict general monitoring (sic) and these attempts are meant to sway some more zealous voices. But a lot of these companies here have shown interest in getting more data rather than less.
Without further comment this seems to be an attempt to fortify their positions as "leading internet companies" as they describe themselves and furthermore...
> limited liability when they take proactive action to ensure that illegal content [...]
... can basically allow propaganda. You just need to conjure a threat of incoming "illegal" content.
In a moment of greatness, which we have very few, EU officials specifically disallowed "forward policing".
Perhaps I do have a fundamental misunderstanding and the ambition is indeed to restrict general monitoring (sic) and these attempts are meant to sway some more zealous voices. But a lot of these companies here have shown interest in getting more data rather than less.
Without further comment this seems to be an attempt to fortify their positions as "leading internet companies" as they describe themselves and furthermore...
> limited liability when they take proactive action to ensure that illegal content [...]
... can basically allow propaganda. You just need to conjure a threat of incoming "illegal" content.