Probably because Telegram is a state-level honeypot. The chances a place like Russia would have its population (and lots of people in what they consider their "ex-colonies") communicate over a platform that they can't intercept and monitor are zero. Add a track record of technical incompetence and an absurd backstory of the founder that escapes from state control to .. Cyprus of all places.
Was wondering about those friendly fire incidents that keeps cropping up from Russian units - one unit got arty on them by the Ukrainians and then they requested counter-fire but their own side dropped it on them instead.
It caused a lot of issues for Russians when they tried to block it, because they basically blocked entire sections of AWS and GCP.
The real tinfoil hat is assuming that they allow it because it's compromised; the founder of Telegram has absolutely no love lost for the Russian state, they basically seized his company (VK; a hugely popular facebook-like which also has a music player and such) and all his assets that were in the country after trying to exert control over him (and his desire not to be controlled); that's why telegram was founded in the first place.
Of course, I have no first-hand account except watching as my video game became unplayable for Russians while the Telegram blocking was happening and my GCP rep explaining it to me, and that I had an Estonian girlfriend for 7 years who was giving me the play-by-play on what was happening.
Possibly the easiest thing to exist in error or for the state to fabricate and yet you didn’t even provide a citation.
tsk
Dude is literally living in exile, yet you claim allegiance by him being affiliated with Russia, when his only crime here was being born in there and thus having some ties.
Seems crazy to me. Like, cold-war propaganda crazy.
this idea that Telegram is somehow nebulously “the enemy” and signal is “the virtuous” is so patently and clearly a propaganda campaign and we fall right into it.
The point of Signal having end-to-end encryption is to avoid trust. Telegram, on the other hand, relies on trust. Obviously that's going to attract more criticism.
That argument doesn't work when you cant reliably distribute and run your own clients and given that they (Signal) have hidden updates for over a year to work on mobilecoin in the dark (proving their willingness and ability to do this) it leaves little left for that argument; theres also a bunch of other stuff but that is meaningless to get into. The point is that Signal mostly also boils down to: “trust us”.
On the other hand, while you are totally right about Telegram being quite a bit “trust us”; but they have better UX and are not at all hostile to third party clients and alternative implementations of their “secure” messaging protocol.
Which is also the subject of a lot of controversy of course, because (*puts on tinfoil hat*) it was originally handrolled and not US cryptographer approved.
(always get downvoted when I point out that Signal is doing weird stuff which only serves really to solidify my stance)
For reasons, yes, but not the nefarious ones you seem to imply. They tried multiple times in the past and created lot of problems for other services as a side effect. Also, a large portion of the Russian population and military use telegram for communication.
However now it seems like Russian mobile providers are blocking not just VPN services but even the underlying VPN protocols (WireGuard, OpenVPN).
Interestingly Telegram is still not blocked in Russia.