Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | 9point6's commentslogin

There's a good chance this might be down to Apple's constantly changing foundations and the fact that a studio's worth of music software can (especially back then) cost a lot of money to upgrade on top of the new hardware requiring the upgrade in the first place. And that's not going into the case where the company that wrote the software has gone bust.

Given you mentioned G4, there's a good chance they had recent memory of having to upgrade a load of stuff to jump from OS9 to OSX. The Intel architecture change required another upgrade for a lot of software, so it probably made a lot of sense to try and eek more value out of the previous round of purchasing before going again.

Hopefully they delayed enough to not get hit rapidly by the changes in Yosemite, Mojave or Catalina which all necessitated upgrades (IIRC, one might have only been some edge cases) or finally the most recent jump to ARM—which still isn't natively supported by a surprising number of DAW or VST vendors.

On Windows I can run any DAW or VST that's been written since about 2006 natively and can even load up a 32-bit DAW if I want to dust off some ancient project with ancient VSTs that never made the jump to 64-bits.


I remember cobbling something like this together myself using a Kodi plugin called PseudoTV a number of years ago

Definitely a lot more usable from a browser for sure. I'd echo other comments that a TV guide style interface would be a fantastic addition that would take this from a "that's cool" to something I'd potentially regularly use.


I'm assuming some kind of instant-on OS feature

which if you're interested—Cathode Ray Dude on youtube has several episode series all about that weird and wonderful point of computer history


This is how these EU regulations get their teeth: turnover not profit and global not local to a region—they can't creatively account their way out of the fine and it's always going to be big enough to really want to avoid, no matter the size of the company. None of this "the fine is just the permit fee for those that can afford it" attitude.


And it's not the company, it's the whole conglomerate.

So Google can't just make an EU subsidiary that never makes a profit and thus the fines don't have teeth.

It's the global turnover of Alphabet Corporation.


I have to assume at least one company is going to try setting up a company, completely divesting from it, and contracting it to perform operations in the EU. With an open process for tender, even.

Not that it'd work, but might be amusing.


The steam deck is a pretty good use case for these cards


Baldur's Gate 3 is a 150GB install size, so with games of this size increasingly being the norm it will quickly get used up.


I was going to say, has OP downloaded a game recently? You can fit 10-20 modern games on this card tops.


Flashbacks to the .NET 1.x/2.x default winform icons


The exact example you're describing is what the ActivityPub spec and the resulting "Fediverse" are aiming to solve. Mastodon and compatible microblogging platforms are distributed versions of Twitter, Lemmy & Kbin are compatible distributed versions of Reddit/HN style link aggregators.

Given the boost both of these parts of the fediverse have gotten from Twitter/Reddit's series of missteps recently, they're starting to look like they could become viable long-term alternatives.


Any kind of life extension breakthrough is going to introduce heaps of problems in how our society functions. It is fundamentally not designed to cope with people not retiring and dying.

Plus, if we've not figured out how to live away from this planet in perpetuity around the same time, we're going to quickly run out of space too.


Yet we have seen that reducing disease, improving mortality rates, increasing life expectancy and quality of life leads to lower fertility rates. When people don’t have to put their children to work in the fields and factories, and children don’t die all the time from disease, people have less kids and focus more effort on them. Those were/are life extension breakthroughs that, while introducing their own societal problems and changes, were a huge benefit to society as a whole.

Living in a rich country vs a poor country is living with life extension breakthroughs. Living now vs 200 years ago is living with life extension breakthroughs. Saying that the breakthroughs up to this point were ok, but any more would be some sort of unnatural abomination feels myopic and short sighted. Plus the idea that it is better to let people die rather than figure out how to adapt our society feels grotesque. How is the right answer “don’t research this life saving thing because if we save people’s lives then they will keep hanging around existing”?


> Any kind of life extension breakthrough is going to introduce heaps of problems in how our society functions. It is fundamentally not designed to cope with people not retiring and dying

Looks like Japan is already there, and many developed countries are only increasing in population because of net immigration.


Oh wow, this has slipped me by entirely, have you got an article about it that I can read?


This website has a good summary https://norightsemployee.uk/faq

There is not much information about it, because that gone through as a change to IR35, so people slept on it, but in reality companies can only hire on "in-scope IR35" contract and bypass employment law altogether.


From the site:

> Is this site trying to sell me something?

> No! We're just here to promote the use of NREs because we believe this is our chance to increase the productivity and fortunes of Great Britain, especially post-Brexit.

So, disingenuous as hell - it's totally a protest site but claims to be pro.

Very large pinch of salt needed here.


Yes it is a protest site. I know a few people who already work this way though.


And there we go ... some indication that it is satrire would help because it just looks dodgy otherwise.

And now I don't trust you one bit, even though I may well be on the same side as you!


Unfortunately I couldn't find any other source that would have the issue presented in a digestible format.

There is another one http://www.loanchargeappg.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/H...


I think the guy you're replying to's point is that Qt versions of the apps he uses don't exist - the Electron ones do.

The alternative to many Electron apps isn't a native app in another framework, it would simply be no app (on linux).


Usually the alternative to many electron apps is the web version which lacks 5% of the features but is 10 times more efficient.


Native and Electron apps have two advantages over web though. Fist one is, that they do have access to the file system. This makes a whole range of applications (like Git Kraken) possible. The other is that an application has an icon in the taskbar/dock. When somebody pings me on slack I know where to go to read it. When somebody calls me in hangouts, I have to go fishing for the tab or window with the site open.


Not true.

One example of a service that probably _could_ have a web version is Spotify, but they only offer their service via their Electron app.

Apps I care about are VSCode, Atom, Spotify, Slack.


Spotify actually does have a web player.


Yup.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: