Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | HWR_14's commentslogin

Why would it be bad to mention Claude in a commit message?

Just because Claude ran the commit command, doesn’t mean it wrote the code. That’s just a nasty marketing hack from Anthropic.

Centering the text on a slide is such a trivial thing. It is the default behavior.

> People complain about bad and useless recommendations and irrelevant ads all the time.

I've never heard any complaint about that except from people who work in adtech.


I see it literally all the time on HN, how useless and spammy and low-quality ads on the internet are.

In contrast to high-quality ads that are e.g. for a movie you actually want to see.


Energy density doesn't seem to matter much in boats. Massive ships carry astronomical amounts of cargo.

The average American shouldn't need top tier accounting to file their taxes.

The average American can file for free, or at least it was possible in the past.

They could also learn to file their taxes, as well as simple tax planning, in a very short video.


I'm not joking, in Australia the tax "filing" takes like 2 mins, you literally go, next, next, look at the details, "yep looks correct" put in your claims, and then submit.

You are all done.

Unless you have something wack going on its not even a process. I have had signups which are more complicated then it.

American taxes on the other hand mega suck, and have 9000 pitfalls.


Finland doesn't even ask you to approve. They send you a suggestion and if you do not amend it by deadline they take it as it is.

And amending is online form where everything is clearly explained, links to documentation. And longest time it takes is actually to look up numbers from your own records.


In the US, property tax typically works that way for many people. You get something in the mail that says this is what your tax will be. If you happen to have a loan for your house, the bank in charge of your loan handles it.

The only opposing political argument I've heard is that if income taxes were this simple, many people would be overpaying. I think that argument has many obvious flaws. Unfortunately few US citizens demand anything of their politicians on this topic or other topics that would dramatically improve their lives. Instead they care more about vanity topics that don't even effect them.


Why would I want a perp on BTC when I can just buy the coin? The example quoted the price of the perp as (close to) the same as the price of BTC, so if I'm not getting leverage why not just buy the coin and avoid counterparty risk?

If the goal is just to buy and hold, then you wouldn't use perps, not only because of counterparty risk but also because the funding rate is typically positive, meaning you pay (usually ~10% APR) to be long.

The point of perps is:

- Easy access to leverage. Unlike options or futures, there's no need to roll over.

- It's the easiest way to short a coin. Most of the time you even get paid the funding rate to be short.

- Trading fees are typically much lower than for spot.

- Volume and liquidity can be better for perps than for spot. The BTC/USDT perp did 10x the volume of the spot pair in the last 24h on Binance.


Because the exchanges offer 20x leverage on perps but not on spot. In theory perps can have deeper liquidity because they can go beyond the 21M BTC limit. If you don't care about those factors then you shouldn't trade perps; they aren't intended to be magically superior to spot.

You are getting leverage. Leverage and liquidity are the reasons you deal in futures.

You want to buy bitcoin to be a bitcoin investor. But if you want to actively trade, both buy and sell, futures offer much more capital efficient solution. With leverage, you can make larger trades with less money.

You can buy (go long) a BTC future with only $10,000 or less of collateral. So you can get lots of leverage.

Another reason is that the future may be trading slightly below the spot price of BTC due to lots of traders shorting.


It's not just the difference in price that would compensate you, it is also the funding rate.

Other than that, futures tend to be more liquid and capital efficient.


A perp is a future which is different from buying BTC at its spot price. If you remove the "perpetual" aspect of the future and it was a regular future that was settling soon, likewise it would be similar in price but not the same as the underlying. There's lots of uses for futures and they're often used as hedges against various forms of risk, like currency risk.

maybe to avoid checking a box on an irs form?

> the economy would contort into something unrecognizable.

You say it as if it was a self evident negative, but isnt that the goal of people who want to ban ads? To dramatically change the economy?


No, we don't. Transit is primarily funded by taxes, then fares and only then ads. Ad-free municipal wifi exists in a lot of places. Etc.

Ad spend is usually tax deductible

The biggest issue in the post is "creates direct links between supply and demand". One of the more important things to do as a manager is sit in hours of meetings so your reports can get a fifteen minute synopsis about the decisions made. And represent your reports in those meetings.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: