>Web 3.0 may be bollocks, but I hope someone distills a good publisher micropayment system out of it. Or maybe a bulk "Netflix/Spotify for news" would be a better approach?
So many RSS feeds these days are basically just "New post - link to site". It's mostly killed the model; what used to be a nice stripped down stream of just the text (and sometimes image) content has become a layer of indirection in the "come look at our ads" shithousery.
Yeah, guilty as charged, but in my defense, I change phones often but my replaced phones go to different family members, who are happy with past generation flagships. My previous two phones are being used and all the previous ones had long lives, it's not like I just bin them.
If they sold the 512 7 Pro in Europe I might buy it and offer the 6 Pro to my mother-in-law who has a 5 or so year-old phone now (or my mother with her 4-year-old one, or maybe to my wife, and she in turn to her mother), but I don't think I will be going through the Australian workaround and the associated customs and warranty risks for that.
You can, but we don't recommend it. Many/most USB-C cables are too thick to properly plug directly into the internal USB-C receptacles, which would make it hard to plug in and put stress on it.
I don’t use Reddit in the sense that I have an account, instead I go through teddit.net using a privacy redirect browser extension, this lets me bypass their redesign by using a different front end.
I put in a moderately specialist topic I'm reasonably expert in. What it wrote was highly convincing. While I wouldn't be particularly impressed, I absolutely couldn't distinguish it from a mediocre human. It's really quite terrifying to think of the internet filling up with this garbage.
Is it garbage if it writes better than most of the humans from the developing world that are currently exploited to churn out meaningless blog spam?
Also, it would have worked perfectly for my girl's homework assignment, but she has morals and decided she couldn't ethically submit it. She did use the output for ideas on what to write, though.
It writes very convincing pop-sci articles about high energy photons and the like. I see no way how even a proper AI can distinguish it from similar articles written by journalists.
