Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OWaz's commentslogin

I've worked for startups and established industry giants and being compliant with GDPR did not stifle us in any way at all. It's really not that hard unless the business model depends on profiting off of user data. No good will come from this for the EU.


Also has an instrument panel the driver can easily see.

I’ve driven a Model 3 and its handling and overall feel was worse than a barebones Honda Civic. I’d say a Model 3 is on par with how a low end Chrysler feels to drive.


I daily drive a Model 3 and when I rented a Honda Civic for a trip I thought it was broken with how long it took to get any speed. You're trolling regarding the Chrysler comment lol

Why are you staring at your instrument panel and not the road? The speed is just a glance at the top corner as you should be focused on driving ;)


After driving car with HUD the Tesla's approach is laughable. Especially when you need to maintain different speed limits in the city.

Reminds me cheap Peugeot 107 where tachometer is an extra option.


“The rumors are that the Navy's newest nuclear sub, the USS Jimmy Carter, has been designed for spywork, with a "special capability... to tap undersea cables and eavesdrop on the communications passing through them," according to the AP.”

https://web.archive.org/web/20070203165457/http://www.defens...


I find it perplexing how people are so open to just dumping personal effort onto these tools and believing the tools work accurately.


Work accurately? Relative to what? Old humans? Make up something about psychology? Physics? Economics? History? Academics have been doing that for years and we all blindly agreed their work was accurate, lauded them, then found out decades later it was garbage.

Seems typical for humans; centuries of false belief religion was accurate, now contemporary nation state politics, economics, and the engineered things they sell for profit.

So long as enough stuff is available on shelves to keep people sedate, they'll believe whatever. Our biology couples us to knowing when we need food, water; keep those normal and no one cares about anything else. Riots only occur when biology is threatened. Everything else about humanity is 100% made up false belief, appeals to empty trust in what we say.

Physics makes it pretty clear its all just skins suits pulling illusions out their ass all the way down. We can never change the immutable forces of physics, there's too much other stuff in universe rushing in to correct. This is it for humans; idle about on Earth hallucinating.


I can agree on Psychology, Economics, and History, but most of Physics is reproducible science.

I think, now more than ever, we need to clearly distinguish reproducible science from untested hypothesise. Reality vs Opinion.

update: opinion is not quite the right word here. Perhaps somebody else can think of a better word.


So if you’re reading a summary of a bullshit document written by an old human, created by a machine trained on billions of bullshit documents written by old humans, what do you get out of that?


This is where I started with Erlang, learned it first then leaned Elixir. I really enjoyed working with Erlang/Elixir & OTP.

I’d agree with previous suggestions, either this book or Joe Armstrong’s.


https://www.youtube.com/@MortismalGaming

Mortismal Gaming - Video game reviewer who will review games after getting 100% Steam achievements. The reviews are typically > 20 minutes.

Primarily focuses on RPG/CRPG games but he is very thorough in each review and seems to be quite fair,no hype it's a proper balanced review. Also he has a ton of Divinity Original Sin 2 content.


If you want to watch a video, check out Joe Armstrong (one of the creators of Erlang) talk about concurrency and Erlang[0]. There are a bunch of Erlang/Elixir videos [1] posted by Erlang Solutions on YouTube.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaUPdgtUYko [1]: https://www.youtube.com/c/erlangsolutions/videos


Are you a US citizen? Do you think you can pass a background check? If military and government projects don't bother you than try looking on clearancejobs.com. From what I've seen a lot of big defense contractors looking for engineers just need you to be a citizen, get a clearance and have a pulse. Smaller firms will expect you to actually be capable and you will probably do a couple things across the stack and some dev-ops too.

Have you looked at any part-time/contract work? Maybe that could keep you afloat and activey coding long enough to get a fulltime job.

Edit: this quora answer is helpful for those of us without elite algorithms skills https://www.quora.com/I-am-quite-bad-at-algorithms-but-good-...


How much of a jerk is your boss? - of the 7 bosses I have they combine for a low score of 2. All are nice people.

How chaotic is your environment? 10 - Agile doesn't mean 6 week waterfall sprints. Unit tests aren't something you do manually and infrequently.

What have you done that is illegal or unethical that can be used as grounds for firing you? Everyday I stay past 6:00pm but I'm only allowed to be on the property till 6:00pm.

What are you currently doing? Waiting for an IBM source control tool to finish doing something.

What would you like to do instead? Learning Erlang & Elixir


Check out Neil Kolban's book on the ESP8266 [1]. I’m reading through this out-of-order just to get an idea about how the esp8266 works.

[1]:https://leanpub.com/ESP8266_ESP32


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: