Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Talanes's commentslogin

>Totally disregarding health warnings, and being insubordinately against precautions rather than becoming more neurotic.

It's not such a clean map between neuroticism and reaction there. My father was very against the precautions in a clearly neurotic manner. To the point where he was just sitting at home ranting about how he couldn't go anywhere or do anything without the vaccine, months after anywhere except a few voluntarily strict venues had stopped checking.


"Just like how you might measure productivity of a warehouse employee by the number of items moved per hour. Of course if someone just throws things across the warehouse or moves things that dont need to be moved they will maximize this metric, but that would be doing the job wrong - which is not a productivity measurement problem."

I fail to see how having a measurement that clearly doesn't measure what is actually produced isn't exactly a productivity measurement problem. If your measurement is defeated by someone doing their job badly, what use is it?


nearly all productivity measurements can be defeated by people doing their job badly and trying to game the measurement.

as a business analyst, there are a lot of things to consider to assess productivity and performance at a distance, and no single measurement is ever relied on too heavily - except if the analyst is doing the job poorly of course


The argument that some people can code with less lines of code but if no lines are written that’s an issue.


There's an argument to be made that Lucas wouldn't have brought it back if they didn't miss the check. A little over half a mil of it's budget came from the initial payout of the new Hasbro deal.


You're describing literally Ferrari.


Ferrari can only enforce those terms by refusing to sell you any more cars, though. There's not much they can do beyond that.

GM also comes to mind, where they void the warranty if you flip your new Z06 or ZR1 within 6 months. It's nothing more or less than an encumbrance on the title, and they shouldn't be able to demand that without consideration in the form of a discount. But they can, because they have monopoly power in that particular niche.

Key point is that Ferrari and Corvette are niche markets. Car customers in general wouldn't put up with it, because there's plenty of competition for their business.


Not everyone can do that, some of use were blocked by him before we'd ever heard his name.


I'm currently reading 'Salt, Fat, Acid, Heat' and the author talks about this exact dilemma. She attributed the difference to the fact that box-cake recipes tend to use oil for the fat, while recipes from scratch often prefer butter. The way oil can fully coat the flour changes how the gluten chains develop during baking, which changes the texture.


It’s impossible — impossible! — for anyone to attend a mass gathering with the pure intention of causing trouble.


>Nobody here is actually even arguing about the proposal here, just repeating platitudes and analogies.

Well, given that they're responding to this:

>I think it's actually pretty clear that almost all people are not capable of secure and reliable self-custody and would be better off with an intermediary. We're not keeping our fiat currency in a safe under our bed after all.

Why would you not expect people to argue in the style you presented them?


The 1993 movie Super Mario Bros. features both a major and minor antagonist clearly modeled after Donald Trump. He was a well known, highly referenced figure for DECADES before he entered politics. Where are you getting this idea that nobody in 2008 could have been thinking about Donald Trump?

He was literally in the middle of his 13-year run on Network tv. If he hadn't won the presidency, that would be talked about as the apex of his time as a public figure.


Isn't the alternate timeline version of Biff Tannen in Back to the Future 2 modeled after Donald Trump? That movie was released in 1989...


The screenwriter said some time _after_ 2016 with never previously noting the connection so take that as you will.


>I just posted a talk by Seymour Papert from 1991 where he said that kids were on computers or Nintendo for 6 hours at a time, which surprised me that even then they were "addictive." He notes that poetry, music, Shakespeare aren't "addictive" in the same way.

He doesn't make any claim as to the addictiveness of poetry, music, or Shakespeare: he pointed out that we use different language to describe childhood compulsions for one activity than we do for another.

My own anecdotal experience on the topic is that I was such a voracious reader as a child that it was a problem in much the same way I see people today complain about kids in screens. I'd hide personal books behind textbooks while I ignored classes, hide under the covers with a flashlight to stay up all night reading, the works.


My wife was like this. Her teachers came to her mother with concerns that she was reading too much.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: