Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | aaronrobinson's commentslogin

You may have a point but you lost me citing Vance and Musk.

This is the same guy that created the ZX81 (that I learned to code on) and the ZX Spectrum. He changed my life.

He hired the people who created those things.

What a strange response.

This is a common misconception. I’m quite happy not being social and have absolutely no need to be needed.

I FIREd 3 years ago and don’t miss working one bit.

I think leaving work becomes more difficult for those who do need to feel valued and especially if they don’t have interests outside of it. There are many people like that.


How do you decide what to immerse yourself in? Do you just search for things independently or do you have a way of selecting content based on your level?

I prefer to start immersion at ~B1 level. I know some people want to do comprehensive input right from the start, but I prefer to build foundations. I start with popular books that I have already read before - The Little Prince, Harry Potter, etc. Then I take books that are interesting for me and work through them. There are graded readers, but the stories are usually very boring. I prefer to read what I like.

This isn’t a job board


The philosophy resonates with me. I even built a spaced repetition app myself while in Brasil a couple of years ago. I started with lists based on things like kitchen stuff etc. you’ve inspired me to resurrect it.

By the way, it’s a bit slow - maybe you’re getting increased traffic from the HN post.

The submit button needs to deactivate after being pressed the first time otherwise you end up pressing it multiple times and it’s like that scene from Toy Story with all the Martians in the machine.

Good luck with it!


Hey, thanks. I'll go fix the toy story bug haha. I am also working on making it quicker by pre-loading the audio. Thanks for the feedback!


The best use of my time is doing the things I want to do but balancing that with the things I have to do to get there.


Google isn’t killing XSLT. They just don’t want to support it in their browser any more. The site is misleading.


When you have 70+% browser market share, stopping support for something _is_ killing it.


It is misleading in so far that XSLT is an independent standard [1] and isn't owned by Google, so they cannot "kill it", or rather they'd have to ask W3C to mark it as deprecated.

What they can do is remove support for XSLT in Chrome and thus basically kill XSLT for websites. Which until now I didn't even know was supported and used.

XSLT can be used in many other areas as well, e.g. for XSL-FO [2]

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/xslt-30/ [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XSL_Formatting_Objects


You say they cannot kill it, and yet they are about to. We'll see who wins, reality or your word games.


What are you talking about? They can’t kill it. Most use is outside the browser. It’s not about mixing words.


I don't think XSLT was invented for the purpose of rendering XML into HTML in the first place. Perhaps it never should have been introduced in browsers to begin with?


XSLT was invented to transform one XML document to another XML document.

Browser can render XHTML which is also a valid XML.

So it's pretty natural to use XSLT to convert XML into XHTML which is rendered by browser. Of course you can do it on the server side, but client side support enables some interesting use-cases.


Wrong. Can you dissenters at least provide proof of your nonsense lies? XSLT is apart of the HTML standard.


No it isn’t.


Yes it is loser


Are you aware that XSLT is mostly used outside the browser?


Reject it


This. And the ones that mean you have to manually switch off multiple legitimate interest toggles mean I just press the back button.


+1 it's a win-win situation. The website announces upfront that they are malicious so I can just leave


I do this as well, but in case I do want to read the site, I just delete the node from the DOM.


> I just press the back button

I do this more and more, and I think it's the right and best thing to do.


Since "legitimate interest" means you don't need consent, they do not let you toggle it off.

If they are showing you a toggle and calling it for "legitimate interest", they are most likely lying.

They love to put cookies under "performance and enhancements" as if that isn't bullshit as well.

All legitimate interest cookies are in the greyed out toggle for "required cookies".

By law, you can decline all and the site should still work fine, which again means they won't allow you to turn off actually needed cookies.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: