> We find that AI use impairs conceptual understanding, code reading, and debugging abilities, without delivering significant efficiency gains on average.
> On average, participants in the AI group finished about two minutes faster, although the difference was not statistically significant. There was, however, a significant difference in test scores: the AI group averaged 50% on the quiz, compared to 67% in the hand-coding group
Speaking of which, I really hate those chargers that force you to use two batteries instead of one. I get that it is cheaper to design it that way, but come on.
NiMH chemistry allows for safe overcharging though. If the chemistry allows for it, why not take advantage of it and have cheaper chargers?
The downside is that "save overcharging" only works at very low charging rates. That's why the double-charger designs all have 10+ hour charge times (mine actually has a 20-hour charge time).
But in practice? Its cheaper to buy 4 extra AA NiMH batteries to keep charged rather than upgrade to the faster chargers. So just keep some spares topped off and you should be fine.
If one battery is 50%, and the other at 70%, and you put both in, one will end up at 80% and the other at 100%. When one is full, those cheap chargers stop charging the pair.
When one is 80% and the other is 100%, the full one enters a state of over charge, reaching 105% or even 110% charge. This is safe.
The H2 reaction then rapidly speeds up, leaking energy in the form of heat. The full battery heats up from overcharge but is otherwise safe.
You end up with both batteries at 100% and maybe 110%, and a day or two later the 110% overcharge settles down to 100% by leaking out.
-------
So you waste a bit of power but as long as the trickle charge is safe and as long as the overcharge is only for a few dozen hours or so, it's fine. In the very long term (if you keep doing this) the NiMH could get damaged. But if we are talking about a once-per-yeqr top off charge, then it's fine.
The problem is like I said before: the safe rate of overcharge is low. This means that these chargers must charge slowly, maybe 10 hours or longer.
Any faster risks blowing through the NiMH innate ability to take an overcharge and convert it into heat. (This results in a forceful vent, a 'pop' sound that permanently damages the NiMH as the H2 gas escapes the safety hatch).
------
Note that these super cheap chargers are simply a glorified 10+ hour timer. They don't even check the state of the AA cells.
So if you stick a 50% full battery in, it will charge the battery to 150%, most likely. (But safely, as the NiMH just leaks out the excess energy as heat, as I said earlier).
Ok, but do you agree that in this day and age of cheap electronics, it is really not worth it to even consider all this and it is better to just make a charger that doesn't overcharge and doesn't come with extra instructions?
It doesn't really make sense to buy a $20 charger when you only have $16 or so worth of AA cells (ie: a 16 pack from Amazon Basics). The $10 charger makes a lot more sense.
As for the knowledge problem: that's easily solved. I already told you what to do so you know how to work the $10 charger now. If you still want the $20 charger that's fine, it's your money.
I suppose there are lots of different chargers. The one I had made both charging lights turn off when one turned green. Maybe it was overcharging but still showing as red till both were charged?
NiMH cells are like $1 each. Seriously, Amazon.com is quoting me $18 for 16 cells, AA Amazon Basics NiMH.
As I said earlier: it's likely a better strategy to buy 4 extra cells and keep them pre charged / topped off, rather than spending a few dollars on a better charger.
I'm not sure that's true in practice. Chargers are often shared in a household and you may not have control over people putting things back on the charger. My preference is to have something that charges more quickly, rather than a bunch of spare batteries.
Plus if you leave batteries on the overcharge-style charger for long periods of time, I'm pretty sure they just dissipate the extra charge as heat, and that charge is applied indefinitely. They essentially turn into little electric space heaters, sending that energy down the drain.
So now you have two piles, you come back after a year and then have to figure out which is which. All of this because someone wanted to save a few cents on the implementation of a charger.
Speaking of which, I have yet to see a consumer battery charger that isn't incredibly cheap feeling. Even ones for charging different chemistries or that let you set current rates are a mess of low-quality molding and cryptic button presses.
I've never had a problem with the basic 4-cell chargers that Panasonic includes with their Eneloop starter kits, other than the mildly annoying fact that they cover more than a single plug on a power strip.
Build quality seems fine, and I've been using them for decades without a single failure, so I've never seen any reason to even investigate alternatives.
Panasonic does have one that charges over USB (micro-USB input though) so you can use an old 5V Apple brick and only take up one spot. It also supports USB out via a full-size USB-A port. Picked one up since I liked the idea of being able to use AAs in a pinch for recharging.
I don’t think it was actually playing noise, you had to tune into the sound somehow, but this was a decade ago. The seats are more valuable than the movie, and most people can watch those on their phones now anyways.
Glorified shopping malls to maul you in to insanity. Duty-free my arse.
My last trip was at xmas and I was waiting for the bus back to home. I decided to stretch my legs and went to the kids arcade. I put a quid in to a mechanical fortune teller machine which freaked on me and refused to tell me my fortune.
It ripped me off a quid and I missed the bus back home.
reply