Where's the concern for the content creators who didn't expect their content to be used to train this stuff to replace them at content creation (or whatever else)?
> By providing Content to the Service, you grant to YouTube a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, sublicensable and transferable license to use that Content (including to reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works, display and perform it) in connection with the Service and YouTube’s (and its successors' and Affiliates') business, including for the purpose of promoting and redistributing part or all of the Service.
> License to Other Users
> You also grant each other user of the Service a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license to access your Content through the Service, and to use that Content, including to reproduce, distribute, prepare derivative works, display, and perform it, only as enabled by a feature of the Service (such as video playback or embeds). For clarity, this license does not grant any rights or permissions for a user to make use of your Content independent of the Service.
considering how poorly Fb and Insta treated users after getting them hooked (every other post seems to be an ad and the whole experience makes it difficult to do what you came for), I'm not sure people are that interested in giving another Meta product a chance or spending time in that universe
the content of the release and the voice seem to betray that this "breakthrough" is now becoming about manipulating users (such as with a flirty voice) and gaining even more data and potential for surveilling and studying us later (why does the assistant need to be capturing video?).
Who really wants a video assistant? aren't video calls just exhausting anyway? does anyone really do video chats with existing human assistants aside from when truly necessary?
OpenAI keeps saying this is all for our good and then making choices that show disdain for us and what we might want out of this
