I have two annoyances with button, one is you probably want to restyle it, so it’s not no effort vs a div.
Another is the warning that you can’t nest buttons.
For better or worse, this is common
The author's conslusion isn't well supported by the evidence they provide. They assert they would never buy a personal Mac, but their primary criticisms are solved by downloading a few apps. It's surprising that they can use Homebrew but not Rectangle etc given their work policy, but these restrictions don't apply for personal computers anyways?
Wow the hot takes on this are terrible, the OP is basically describing the difference between scripted and unscripted and unrelated discussion. Scripted is obviously more refined, e.g. a book, unscripted and unrelated e.g. casual discussion can be less engaging and is a different experience. Different people like different stuff, we don’t have to all love the same stuff. And we especially don’t need to hit out at the OP because y'all think you're superior to them cause y'all love socialising geez
See the thing is that I think we give a lot of credit in the cost of context switching, no one talks about the reverse cost, sometimes you have 5 tasks to do in a day and you don't context switch and focus only on the one task at the detriment to other tasks. You ruin your sleep because you're so focused on getting something done and it's only 3am, and so ruin your next day of productivity
I know people will be up in arms about tech companies abusing data, whatever that means, but what I don't fully understand from the article is why this is happening.
> Facebook’s UK users will remain subject to UK privacy law, which for now tracks the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
My understanding is similar to this, which is that all the privacy laws are the same, so is this a Brexit thing because the UK is outside of the EU so it's a legal liability to hold information within the EU (Facebook Ireland as it says)?
My guess is this is exactly what the "deal/no-deal" divergence talks are about. Today, the UK and EU GDPR rules are in alignment. But on the 2nd January, there's nothing to stop the UK from throwing them away.
Yes there are other countries in the world on this forum, you'll find Trump is not favoured in many countries like Germany where opinion polling was around 9/10 disproving of Trump. Many grains of salt to get that to 50/50
These things aren't cut and dry, but probably what you mean is that without the vaccine you're increasing the possibility of passing the disease on to at risk groups.
At risk populations have the same choices I have. I will choose to wait because I am not at risk. The risk level is obviously a factor that should play a part in making an individual's choice.
Now, for the people that _cannot_ get the vaccine for whatever reason, ultimately my decision is definitely more selfish, in that I am taking precautions in favor of my own safety as opposed to theirs. I guess I don't think this is unreasonable though?
Yes, emphasis is sometimes not clear, so just highlighting that you yourself are unlikely to die as you highlighted, but the increased likelihood of passing the disease on to those who can't take the vaccine is of greater emphasis
It has been through human testing for 10 months or something like that? We've also had stay at home and social distancing guidelines for about the same amount of time and I think we've had the opportunity to see what effect that's had.
I think in this case what you're highlighting is number of people vaccinated, so you'd like to see more people vaccinated first, rather than increasing the duration of analysis of the existing people that have been vaccinated.
Did you read the article? There is nothing in the article in support of government oversight of private companies. Rather, the article argues that private companies should choose to do the right thing, and that consumers should take their business to companies who choose to do the right thing.
