Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bilegeek's commentslogin

For anybody who's still confused, the tl;dr is ASDF is the actual package loading mechanism, Quicklisp doubles as an ASDF wrapper and a package manager.

No. It's FVWM-specific.

Problem is MSRP is also inflated, and Covid has locked that in. Arc Battlemage is the only exception I see.

You’ve never been able to buy more GPU performance per dollar than you can today.

That's not very encouraging because that statement has been true most every day in computing for the past 50 years. The rate at which the compute per dollar increases is what matters.

Yeah moores law is slowing down for sure. I’m just pushing back on the whole sky is falling doomerism in the PC community. I will admit I’m lucky that my current system with 64GB of memory and a 4090 is likely to be good for years to come so I can wait out the ram shortage.

Once the bubble pops, there will be a recession, lots of regular people will lose their jobs and won't be able to afford anything even IF prices come down.

They've got you coming and going.


Yup. As much as I am skeptical of AI and do believe this is a bubble, I don't want to see a repeat of ~2000.

Windows XP only supports UEFI because of some excellent hacks[1]. Haven't seen anything for NT or 2k beyond some preliminary testing[2].

[1]https://msfn.org/board/topic/186793-csmwrap-boot-csm-on-uefi...

[2]https://msfn.org/board/topic/183745-is-it-possible-to-boot-w...


Inexpensive, probably not. E1.S isn't just a different connector, it's a completely different protocol than PCIe.


> it's a completely different protocol than PCIe.

Wrong. It is still just NVMe over PCIe like every other modern SSD form factor.


You're right, I was confusing E.1S and CXL.


1.) IPv4 is still heavily favored over IPv6.

2.) Market segmentation: keeps home users from easily hosting their own services without spending $$$ on an upgraded plan.

3.) Adding on to #2, I've seen claims of providers putting IPv6 behind NAT, so don't think full IPv6 acceptance will solve this problem.


> I've seen claims of providers putting IPv6 behind NAT, so don't think full IPv6 acceptance will solve this problem.

I get annoyed even when what's offered is a single /64 prefix (rather than something like a /56 or even /60), but putting IPv6 behind NAT is just ridiculous.


What is a single /64 prefix not enough for?


Multiple local networks while still using SLAAC.


Separating out main, guest, work, internet-of-shit, security & VPN subnets


Problem is some kids don't have alternatives to online. Just recently on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945114

Not saying you're wrong, but it's more complicated than you think in many cases. The rot goes deep into society as a whole, which tech corpos then exploit.


> some kids don't have alternatives to online

A phenomenon that's facilitated by their access to screens. (There is a horrifying class divide emerging in the West in the 1:1 relationship between kids' screen time and the parents' wealth.)


I wish things had gone differently too, but a couple of nitpicks:

1.) It's already a miracle Xerox PARC escaped their parent company's management for as long as they did.

3.) IBM was playing catch-up on the supercomputer front since the CDC 6400 in 1964. Arguably, they did finally catch up in the mid-late 80's with the 3090.


Are there any studies on people who grew up with similar isolated childhoods in the 20th century (as in modern-day levels, even comparing with the late 20th declining average)? It would be interesting to see the similarities/differences between them and modern cohorts, and if surrounding culture made adult integration harder or easier (though I'm rather pessimistic on that). Any HNer willing to share a personal anecdote on this?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: