Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bytebuster's commentslogin

Me: Most probably, <insert any lab name here> has used hype and hokum to raise money.


I don't know any of the people involved in whatever happened. But this statement is simply not true.

You should not tolerate intolerance. "If a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant".

Some people can and will abuse the "you can't use violence against me under any circumstance" rule you just mentioned to do very bad things.


I would argue that resorting to physical violence to resolve verbal conflicts is quite high on the scale of intolerable things.

> You should not tolerate intolerance. "If a society is tolerant without limit, its ability to be tolerant is eventually seized or destroyed by the intolerant".

I have issues with this absolutism. What is "intolerance" or not is dependant of culture and context. Such a thin line that can be so easily moved, and you end up with the moral equivalent of "3 felonies a day". Then before you know it, you get fired because someone deemed that using 'they' indiscriminately is a form of intolerance.


I would argue that this line is not thin at all, you are just mixing things.

There is a huge gradient between "using 'they' indiscriminately" and "I believe killing all jews is the way to go".

The point is not "do not tolerate ANY FORM of intolerance", just that tolerance should have clear limits.


> There is a huge gradient between "using 'they' indiscriminately" and "I believe killing all jews is the way to go".

The problem is that the gradient between those is smooth, and there's no obvious Schelling Points to stop at.


This is so shallow it feels like it was written just to create buzz.

It's so easy to build a shallow and polarized list like this about ANYTHING. All I can take from this article is that this guy doesn't seem to be good at argumentation. 2/10 on Apple whining.

Here, take your buzz.


And I'm sure that everybody hitting F5 to see if it's back is causing no problem at all, no no. Waiting anxiously for the writeup!


oh wow. that's a long list.


aka the whole world.


digitalocean.com is down as well (seems to affect cloudflare-gated websites)


of course you can, it's just another hotkey.


My opinion:

The article implies the hardware is fine, it's your workflow that's too heavy. I want a machine that fits my workflow, not the inverse.

Even though the article implies that there isn't much difference, the difference in productivity can be HUGE. Specially for workflows that depend on crappy^H^H^H^H^H^Hdemanding applications.

From the perspective of a company:

The cost of laptops relative to salaries is minimal - Salaries are usually close to six figures/y, a very good laptop is $2~3k, and can last multiple years. The productivity increase will most probably cover the investment (not only in terms of direct return, but business value: could be time to market, fulfilling a tight deadline, etc).

From the perspective of a freelancer:

You are selling your time. A laptop that costs $2~3k will free some time (time saved) and be used for years. Time saved = FREE MONEY.

The only reason I see to don't upgrade a laptop/desktop used to work is if it's performance it's already close enough of a new one. BONUS REASON: newer versions have keyboards that self-destruct.


This person = Palmer Luckey = Oculus VR founder


And he literally didn't like and hacked his own product as a consumer?


He left the company last year.


Or rather was kicked out for links with the Alt-Right.


By which we mean he made a single $10,000 donation to an organization that at the time of his donation had put up one single anti-Hillary billboard.


I think context is important for understanding the response. From what I recall at the time, the article that first broke this news and defined the narrative was this article from the Daily Beast: https://www.thedailybeast.com/palmer-luckey-the-facebook-nea...

Describing it as a $10K donation for a single anti-Hillary billboard misses the parts of the story that caused controversy at the time. The controversial aspects included his connection to Milo Yiannopoulos and moderators of r/The_Donald, and their connections to abusive online behavior and white supremacist rhetoric.


Wasn't it more than that?


@wronghorse, If I'm reading that FEC page you linked to correctly, the only donations listed before his firing were to Ted Cruz and Dana Rohrabacher, neither of whom is even vaguely alt-right.

Palmer's big donating spree happened after his firing, and those later donations still didn't go to alt-right causes/candidates, just Republican ones.

[edit: The post I was side replying to has been deleted. Sorry if this post now makes less sense.]


"Dana Rohrabacher, neither of whom is even vaguely alt-right"

Uhhh what now?


I thought the donation was to some other group making political memes and not a candidate....?


Wasn't he funding a group that was posting fake news and memes online?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: