Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | chrkl's commentslogin

Unfortunately, this fork does not look very vivid. Last commit in March, almost not activity in terms of PRs and issues. I would not bet on it.


What sort of activity level are you expecting from a stable project?


People have a hard time orienting if coming from js, where a 'stable' project means refactoring the entire code base to keep up with the dependencies refactoring their apis every 2 months.


plus, they are investigating old edgy errors in many issues, rescuing them (already closed) from the old project.


"Vivid" is the javascript definition of touching shit when it works and breaking it


Vivid?


Definition 3: “Full of life, strikingly alive.”

Etymology: “Borrowed from Latin vividus (“animated, spirited”), from vivere (“to live”), akin to vita (“life”), Ancient Greek βίος (bíos, “life”).”

I like it!

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/vivid


A fairly unidiomatic rendering of "lively", I think.


Would love to see also a Vault fork


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: