Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | disqard's commentslogin

Reminds me of SpeechJammer:

https://sites.google.com/site/qurihara/top-english/speechjam...

(which won the Ig Nobel prize in 2012)


Why the fuck is this flagged?

I have always supported Adafruit -- Limor's principles shine through in the products, the website, the tutorials, and in the long-term track record of standing by their products. Even when I can source things from AliExpress, I often get them from Adafruit.

Speaking for myself, SparkFun has lost me as a customer.


> The history directory contains information on the history of edbrowse, how it came to be and what it is trying to accomplish. This includes a wikipedia article, written in markup. It was deleted by the wikipedia maintainers, for lack of sources. If edbrowse is described in a book or mainstream magazine in the future, perhaps this article can be reintroduced

The title of this blog post immediately reminded me of "Big Ball of Mud":

http://laputan.org/mud/


That was a fun read, maybe worthy of its own post (presumably again, if it’s been long enough)


I think you have a point.

I often think of Tony Hsieh (Zappos founder/CEO), who was a much more grounded and humble person before he became extremely wealthy. Perhaps he had the tendencies/propensities (that ended his life) dormant all along, and his wealth suddenly boosted those deadly habits.

He went from this:

https://youtu.be/jJ5k_Byd9Fs?si=XeYpu-rUNos_dwgI

...to this:

https://straightforwardinteractive.com/2020/12/08/tony-hsieh...


Tony was a genuinely good person from all the information I’ve consumed on him. The wealth was kryptonite to him. For the others, it is an accelerant.

Sometimes I think if Tony had given all the wealth away, he'd still be here. A cautionary tale.


His story really is a tragedy. We have a long way to go to properly treat mental health issues as a health issue (no different than allergies, cancer, etc), and to eradicate the stigma of acknowledging, accepting, and ultimately addressing them.

You can't be a billionaire without pathology. The power, unlimited access to every resource, the inherent isolation, security implications, factual immunity to most consequences, morbidly twisted self-efficacy, the ethical dissonance of having it all while others starve... the human brain evolved adapted to scarcity and existential group boundaries to check on social pathology. These guys are holistically unchecked, inherently dysregulated on every axis. Their brain is constantly in an extraordinary, extreme state, trying to reach homeostasis for a life that couldn't be more distant, trying to find a model of reality which explains the abnormal signals it is getting.

Why not speed up the collapse? That would Effectively Accelerate our current timeline.

Quick collapse, slow collapse, the results will be vastly different, I think, with other parties taking advantage of the chaos whichever degree it will be.

Our timeline is moving on with or without the US. Electrification is going to happen, the US will just slow down how fast the number will go up. The world isn't reliant on US innovation anymore I imagine so it'll go up regardless.


Well mainly because it sucks living under the Trump Administration, even if supporting them is objectively the most accelerationist move.

Thank you so much for this factual reply debunking the GP's (very common) misconception.

Via popular media, there's a narrative that "it's easy to come here legally". Having done that myself, I know that it's not straightforward -- even if all of your paperwork + travel history is in order.


It's not easy for an individual to come to the US because it is such a popular thing to do. From the perspective of Americans, it appears that large numbers of regular people are accomplishing it (because they are - they're just numerically small compared to all the world's people who want to accomplish it).

> "solving the right problem wrong" vs "solving the wrong problem right".

That's a really useful framing!


You reminded me of how Marshall McLuhan called TV a "cool" (as opposed to "hot") medium.

My interpretation is that back in his day, TV was grayscale, grainy, and interlaced, and therefore demanded that the viewer exert their imagination to "complete the picture".

I imagine that if he were to see today's 4k full-color 120Hz panels, he would call TV a "hot" medium.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: