Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | efutch's commentslogin

I bought a numbered print in 1993, the robot coming out of the egg and have it framed in my office, it's great!


This would be really out-of-this-world amazing if it had QuickAssembler's UI


"Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson


I would love something to reply to WhatsApp or other messages with a prepackaged response, something like "I'm driving", "In a meeting", it could be customizable from the phone


Nice, no Compile option though? Is it an interpreter? I tried a Hello, World, and the (Input,Output) after the program name choked it. Nice job!


The "Compile" option was, I think, for when you wanted to generate a .COM or .EXE. So I don't support that. The "Run" command does compile and run, though.


If I remember right it was COM only until TP4.


Yep!


Oh interesting, none of my programs had (input,output) so my parser doesn't support that. It was optional in TP and I don't think did anything.


They could be using some kind of format-preserving encryption, but then they would have needed an unhashed version of the password to generate this "phone input" field.


You could use the "Understanding the Linux kernel" book by Bovet and Cesari.


Perhaps nitpicking, but this is because of a bug in the leap second implementation, not in the leap second per se.


I'd guess it happens by the concurrence of a lep second and a leap second implementation bug. The bug without leap seconds would also not lead to problems.


How about the old Casio PB-700 up to the PB-2000 that were programmable in Basic, C and Prolog?


Recently we talked in our OS class about the 68K and its lack of MMU, this article provides great insight on those days!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: