Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fho's commentslogin

Then let me quickly say: thank you! I used that algorithm three times in different projects during my academic "career" :-)


You might be interested in RWKV: https://www.rwkv.com/

Not exactly "minimal viable", but a "what if RNNs where good for LLMs" case study.

-> insanely fast on CPUs


My personal idea revolves around "can I run it on a basic smartphone, with whatever the 'floor' for basic smartphones under lets say $300 is for memory (let's pretend RAM prices are normal).

Edit: The fact this runs on a Smartphone means it is highly relevant. My only thing is, how do we give such a model an "unlimited" context window, so it can digest as much as it needs. I know some models know multiple languages, I wouldnt be surprised if sticking to only English would reduce the model size / need for more hardware and make it even smaller / tighter.


Started a comment to write basically what you said. I've been commuting like that for five years. At the end I didn't bother trying anything productive anymore.

Losing 2-3h per day commuting is not something I am gone miss anytime soon.


Just nitpicking, but there is at least one ball next to his contraption in his video :-)

Doesn't make the whole thing less remarkable.


Don't Github have emoji reactions? I would assume that those tie "PR" and "needs emojis" closely together.


> On the ground, we know that creating CLAUDE.md or cursorrules basically does nothing.

I don't agree with this. LLMs will go out of their way to follow any instruction they find in their context.

(E.g. i have "I love napkin math" in my kagi Agent Context, and every LLM will try to shoehorn some kind of napkin math into every answer.)

Cursor and Co do not follow these instructions because they:

(a) never make it into the context in the first place, or (b) fall out of the context window.


I still remember when Google (and Facebook?) used XMPP for their chat functions. You could log into any XMPP client and chat with people using Google infrastructure.

Good times, I feel old now.


Yeah I used to use Pidgin to chat with people on Facebook! I miss those days.


Yeah, I had iChat logged into 4 different things, one of them being AIM.


Plus at least one motor plus sun tracking controller. All of that has to operate 24/7, all year.

Depending on your local climate, that has to be sun and rain proof. (Most Nema 7 "3D printer" motors are not waterproof... Ask me now I know )

Nothing a quick hack job can't solve for you, but if you want to sell it (and make sure your customers will be satisfied for decades) it quickly adds up in price.


You don't need a motor. You need a recurring calendar reminder to send someone out there to spin them all 2x per year at whatever day you determine to be the ideal crossover point where you want to switch between NS and EW.

The panels can be stayed in their correct positions by a trash tire or whatever buried in the ground with two chains poking out to clip to the panel corner.

None of this is rocket science. This is all stuff that has been proven out over the past 200yr of fence and gate construction.

Similar could be used for changing between tilted and vertical though you'd need more material.


I've been playing Go with my spouses brother for a while. He had a lot of free time to studyGo back then, I didn't. I couldn't get a single win out of him, still I enjoyed every single game.

We rarely play anymore, I should invite him over sometime :-)


I'm on the other side of this, meeting a friend two or three times a month to play Go and giving him a three stone handicap on a 13 by 13 board.

Sometimes I play a move with a huge, but hidden threat behind it. If he plays elsewhere instead of answering locally, I get to play a clever sequence and capture some stones. I could just wait for the blunder and win. Instead I give a quick lesson in tactics: here is my plan, if you want to play elsewhere, your move needs to have an even bigger threat behind it.

He is learning, and now I face my clever moves being player against me. This makes it harder for me to win (it is about 50:50 with the handicap), but also more fun for me to play.

You could ask your spouses brother for a "teaching game" or a larger handicap, or a bit of both.


"two or three stones" sound huge. We are 20k vs 14k, iirc that does not justify a three stone handicap.

Our games feel relatively close, it's just evident that he is always ahead.


On a 19 x 19 board the ranks are traditionally determined by the handicap needed to give an even game. So a 14 kyu would give 20 - 14 = 6 stones to a 20 kyu. 20 kyu is a rank that often sees rapid improvement, as the basic ideas "click" just through play and experience. You might be stronger than that now.

Handicap stones give a greater advantage on smaller boards, but 19 x 19 is the standard size. I've not seen any specific guidance for smaller boards.


Am I the only one who apparently can't count the dots in 24: Eye Exam?

I know about the optical illusion, but no idea how to count them.


look at each dot carefully


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: