Codepen is certainly part of it. Lots of boxes with nothing inside but centered text saying things like "See the Pen Spooky Boo! by Will Boyd (@lonekorean) on CodePen."
Nothing on that page animates for me, although I'm sure that's my fault. CSS should work, but I've got a whole lot more than just JS disabled in this browser too. For what it's worth I tried to search the page for the words "ghost" "table" and "price" and couldn't find any mention.
Probably because: "i did something unspecified and now it doesn't work" is kind of an annoying comment. More to the point, nobody promised that the page doesn't use javascript, just that the techniques presented do not need js in principle.
It's just weird to me how often people who have their own websites and are perfectly capable of self-hosting demos of things that don't require javascript make the decision to instead use a website to showcase them that requires JS to work or be visible at all.
I fully understand my configuration is unusual. I don't think it's unusual to expect that a certain number of people who don't use JS would be interested in a site that offers cool CSS tricks that don't require it, so it's strange to see those same people being unnecessarily excluded. To the writer's credit they have some source available in their article at least.
Interesting how they achieved the three gradient blocks with the angled corners. And the mockup of the app isn't an image - it's actually done in HTML.
Most hero sections in mid-2010s did not use CSS and JS animations to this extent. Video playback with an overlay gradient was one technique to animate a hero, but that's not the same level of quality and craft as moving DOM elements. IIRC BDC made these in vanilla (according to some design podcasts).
The Bitcoin page is another example of meticulous design work, remaking Vim in HTML here is crazy.
I am a beginner React developer. Currently I learn by working on my own project and reading docs.
It occurred to me that you have a working app, presumably written in React. (Actually Tic Tac Toe lesson is not working for me right now, but that is beside the point).
If some of the Codeamigo code were presented as a lesson, it could serve two purposes. To help me learn React and to see in context a working app where the lesson's code has been implemented. It needn't be all of it, just those points you feel might be most instructive. Presumably you wouldn't do that if you are planning to keep the app closed source. Hence my question.
If you're interested in helping out definitely email me at the email in my profile, and please do let me know what isn't working with regards to the React tic-tac-toe lesson!
