Tangentially related: Does anyone remember the name of this startup/service that was on HN (I believe), that enables you to infer actions from plaintext.
Eg: "Switch on the lights" becomes
{"action": "switch_on",
"thing" : "lights"
}
etc.. I'm trying really hard to remember the name but it escapes me.
Speech recognition and <above service> will go very well together.
This looks really great. I just wanted to point out that the "Write a Post" feature doesn't seem to work. I wrote a test entry and clicked save, it says:
Oh, please. The article uses the word porn exactly three times in the introductory paragraphs. Four if you count the title.
The comments here have double that, including your own use. If you were genuinely that paranoid about being "logged" for having visited a page that used the word porn (really?!) I doubt you'd be using it yourself.
I apologize if it sounded that way, but I wasn't insinuating that I'm going to get into trouble.
I'm just saying that it could get someone into trouble.
As far as the "logging" goes, it had more to do with the word porn in the title of the page, because many content-filters just parse the title for blacklisted words.
This looks really awesome. Also, you should check out Republia Times, one of the author's other games - you're the editor of the major newspaper in some country, and the pieces you put on the front page determine the mood of the people etc. It's a really cool game : http://dukope.com/play.php?g=trt
This is OT: I've always wanted to take a crack at a couple of problems/semi-thought-experiments I came up with:
1) Find the verified Twitter account followed by minimum number of users - This is easy, since Twitter maintains an official list of verified accounts at https://twitter.com/verified/following . We could iterate over this list, and find the minimum.
2) Find the maximum-followed non-verified Twitter account. Now this is a harder problem. Does anyone have any ideas apart from brute-forcing Twitter handles?
2) I think you'd be likely to find it by just crawling the graph, but it'd be very hard to prove that you had found it. For example, @sockington https://twitter.com/sockington has 1.4M followers.
Hi pattle - I know exactly what/how you're feeling - I stutter as well, and am currently interviewing.
The biggest problem of stuttering during interviews is not the stuttering itself, but rather the break in the train of thought while brainstorming answers to interview questions.
First off - phone interviews are a nightmare for me - and I almost always fail to make an impression - because of the several ticks I produce while trying not to stammer.
I used to think I would do better at face-to-face interviews, since I can at least write on the whiteboard. Every piece of interview advice I've read says that one should keep speaking while thinking during an interview, and not just be silent and think - which is how I work best, because my brain is freed from the burden of speaking correctly.
When I 'speak while thinking of solutions', my brain automatically starts focusing on being careful about not stammering, and that really hurts my ability to focus on solving the questions - which are quite difficult in the first place.
One solution that's partially helped: I know that many stutterers are much better off when saying something semi-rehearsed, whether it be a phrase like, "So the brute force solution is _____ " or whatever. My brain goes into mechanical mode while saying this phrase, giving it more time to actually think.
I've never revealed to interviewers that I have a stutter (even though they would probably suspect that by the end of the interview), but I guess you should consider what edw519 says in the top comment.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions.
This is aside the point of your blog post, but IMO it is entirely unreasonable to assume that you'll receive a digital download when you've bought a software on DVD.
I'm a huge proponent of DRM-free and open software. But think about this: It just happened to be that you were dealing with Adobe, who have the resources to make huge digital downloads available. What if the software on your DVD was made by a small company who can't afford to host multi-gigabyte downloads? When you bought the DVD, it was with an explicit assumption that you could use the DVD in a DVD drive.
Finally, yes, customer-service chats suck (except for Amazon - I continue to be amazed by how awesome their service is), and calling a company up is almost always more effective.
In today's day and age I think its reasonable. Even when I bought it, I knew I could download it online and use the same license key. That was an option until Adobe released the new CS6. Further, this download is still available to you if you bought the digital download. What I couldn't understand is why they would not provide the same service to a customer who buys via DVD.
Amazon's EC2 service's most expensive data transfer to-internet option is 12 cents per gigabyte. So at most $1 to give a customer a direct download of a product with no marginal cost that he paid hundreds of dollars for. I think it would be reasonable to expect a small company to do this too.
Eg: "Switch on the lights" becomes
{"action": "switch_on", "thing" : "lights" }
etc.. I'm trying really hard to remember the name but it escapes me.
Speech recognition and <above service> will go very well together.