So the problem IS that people are putting in too much (even if accidentally) ?

The problem is that the typical delivery mechanism for this drug is a highly-dilute injection or transdermal patch - not 'geometric' dilution into pills in Jose's basement with questionable fillers.

The substance is too potent per physical unit of weight and volume to be conveniently dosed through other means.

There are several concrete proposals to regulate AI either proposed or passed. The most recent prominent example of a passed law is California SB53, whose summary you can read here: https://carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/10/california-sb...

Australia's soon-to-take-effect ban affects nine platforms, including Instagram and Facebook, but not HN. These bans often operate on the amount of users a platform has, so HN is unlikely to make the cut. Nobody cares about this site.

Jonathan Haidt, the most prominent psychologist pushing for restrictions on social media use for children, is also the most prominent proponent of letting kids play and roam more freely. So no, those are not the same people.

What a fantastic way to write a post mortem, pedagogically very useful.

At least in part, according to the article, because the not-yet-on-GLP1 folks are NOT customers since they are often denied coverage in the first place.

The West told plenty of its companies, through public pressure or laws, that they have to divest from Russia, and they did. Rationally they recognized that selling their assets is financially more lucrative than just closing their operations and making 0$. Now why would an corporation which alleges to not be controlled by a government refuse to sell and forego billions in income, even though it is against the interest of their shareholders?

Because they don’t want to have a strong competitor in case they come back, or gave they competitor enter other markets they are still active in. Also, not all (if any) companies that divested from Russia sold "their assets" including IP such as algorithms.

As far as I know that was a distinct, previous endeavor. Only afterwards did the Vinklevoi approach him to make the website, an idea which he then allegedly ran with on his own.

Does 4Chan also have bot BEHAVIOR detection (e.g. unnatural mouse movements)that google captcha has?

It does not, at least not once you pass the Cloudflare Turnstile challenge (which can be done with an API as well.)

The results here suggest it does not.

Yeah I had been under the impression that the point of captchas like this (and those "slide a puzzle piece" ones) weren't the solution to the problem as much as checking for human-like mouse movements.

The article provides almost no hard data to back the headline up. They link a report on buy backs, but at least the abstract/summary does not provide support for the claim either.

Written in a very partisan way, although the description of how stock buy backs create bad incentives for CEOs sounds convincing to me.