Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | justinj's commentslogin

> When you look at a project’s code for the first time, what are the things you look for?

Tests.


Obvious bugs.


how did that post even address its title? let alone warrant a single HN upvote?


> It has to _become_ a platform.

> It was a few weeks ago at the first ever AngularJS conference, ng-conf, that all of my assumptions about Angular were proved true.

According to the OP, it changes everything because it has 'become a platform'. Whether that is true or not is up for discussion, a discussion that is definitely HN-worthy.


pickadate is just as opinionated as jquery ui. why must component writers insist on hard-coded (and non-customisable) use-cases. there's simply no need to mandate an `input` element.


You might enjoy my attempt. No jQuery dependency and binding to an input field is optional.

https://github.com/dbushell/Pikaday



the implication that learning to code results in 10,000 viewers? please. it wasn't your coding skills that brought in those UVs. by your logic, all of the sites created by shit-hot coders like us should hit 10,000 views in the first two hours easy. you're propagating the kinds of myths that i debunk daily with friends and family, who grossly underestimate the difficulty of attracting eyeballs to their content (and whose motivation sadly erodes when said eyeballs don't instantly materialise).

if people have something to contribute, there are so many tools and services out there that negate the need for coding it isn't funny. i always advocate non-coders to test out their market theories using tumblr, wordpress, facebook, twitter, posterous, pinterest, et al before rushing off to pay someone to develop something. (in fact, i think us developers should bill ourselves for our own time on our own projects, but that's fodder for another post).

should the average person understand tech? definitely. understand the web? for sure. hypertext markup? why not. javascript? yea, you can skip that.

jeff atwood, you are right on the money.


thx. @neosavvy and i are running the event.


When will we know if we're accepted/denied?


@thechut - i confess that's the first time i'd seen either of those concepts. they seem like intriguing concepts that are well suited to school environments.

however, tilt is about getting experts and creatives from different fields to work together in a novel way, with no one person in charge. personally, i'd err away from anything that promotes the student/teacher relationship in this particular context.

i think an afternoon is sufficient for a themed competition - anything longer may be less accessible to a number of our participants. this could change in future events, but we'll have to see.


@amirmc, it is a little vague. part of the idea is to shape it to the attendees but let me provide a little color [sic].

the idea behind tilt is an event that actually involves each any every participant. we are aiming at cross pollination between various disciplines in the hope that people learn to mingle outside their inner circle.

instead of simply "networking", the game element behind tilt gives attendees a way to determine if others are people they could actually work with. how do they think under duress? how well do they respond to changes in the environment? how creative are they.


compete with other teams over the course of an afternoon, honing an idea around a themed concept. each round will set valuations and present new challenges. teams can buyout others and have to pivot to stay ahead. winner takes all.


So like a startup role playing game for those who are not ready to invest real time and money? What happens to the idea and the "products"?

This has nothing to do with a hackathon, please change the title.


@exDM69, certainly there is a play on the word hackathon. the aim here is to take the hacking out of it and yet keep the fundamental brainstorming that is central to any group think. just because there isn't any code created, doesn't mean the ideas/concepts are less valid.

the attendees are investing real time - just not an entire weekend. both myself and @neosavvy - the creators of the event - are hackers who work full time. this event is aimed at people who are curious to work with others in more than just a hacking sense. the aim isn't just to involve developers, but also individuals who have skills in other industries, such as robotics, media and biotech.

what happens to the products is whatever the teams want to do with them.


@seltzered_ you make a good point. we do need to cast the net wider.

one of the problems is that other professionals are typically less likely than your average hacker to attend a new type of event. as such, the hope is that everyone invites a few of their professional friends from these other industries who are curious and open to the experience.

@neosavvy and i are actively inviting these types of people from our own networks, to augment the high hacker contingent.

if you have other suggestions of ways to get the concept out to those on the fringe of their professions, please let us know.


There needs to be promoting this to venues outside of HN then to get robotics/biotech interest. Otherwise this sounds fairly similar to "startup weekend" events.


@exDM69 It is a great opportunity that we are trying to put together to help us all network with some new people and not have to commit a very valuable full weekend to a startupweekend style brainstorming session. We claim no ownership of the ideas but if a group wants to move forward with them they are welcome to do so.


Public domain - fair game.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: