Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | leros's commentslogin

I get that captcha at coffee shops all the time. I wonder if so many tabs refreshing at once hit a rate limit.

I haven't used StackOverflow hardly at all since ChatGPT came out.

Unrelated to AI, I haven't really had a positive experience on StackOverflow in 7+ years. The way they aggressively close questions as duplicates despite the previous questions having incomplete or outdated answers was already making it a much less useful site.


At your size, I would think bringing payments in-house would be financially worthwhile. I worked at a company doing less than $1B in revenuesand we had our own payment processor integrations. It requires some work in each country/region. In the US our partner was Chase.

Can you explain more on how you did this? If you work directly with Chase they charge interchange+0?

I don't know. I wasn't that close to the project unfortunately.

I've gone through some shenanigans like with AWS. I now have a rule that I don't use any cloud providers where I can't get proper customer service which rules out the main big clouds.


Can you start on a library computer or something like that? I think some libraries also lend out laptops.


Here's the thing: It doesn't matter what you do. It matters what other people know you did. You've got to be a self-promoter to get places. You might get lucky occasionally and have a manager who does this for you, but you generally have to do it yourself. It's like marketing yourself and then selling yourself to others.


I got super excited thinking this was for real birds. I would love someone to gamify birding.


Not sure if this meets your criteria, yet iNaturalist [1] is kind of "gamified". Has a rather large "bird" taxon observation amount. 38,393,861 observations, 11,165 species, 1,130,700 observers, 188,988 identifiers (people who identify species from your pictures)

When Romania announced that the Lesser Kestrel had returned after 100 years iNaturalist actually had several of the observations in the nearby area. [2]

[1] https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?subview=map&taxon_i...

[2] https://www.inaturalist.org/observations?subview=map&taxon_i...


I guess it's not intensely gamified, but I have a couple friends at like 80-90% on Merlin. It's their excuse to travel and live abroad


This is actually exactly what I’ve been working on as a passion project for the last year and a half: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wings-whistles/id6503321263

It’s basically a gamified version of Merlin. Would love any and all feedback!

Birdle Go seems really cool, very impressed and would love to test that!


Any chance you'll release an android version?


Yes! I’m aiming to release it by January at the latest. I’m using tflite rather than coreml so that the transition is easier.


What’s missing from eBird?


Certainly gamified a bit as I learned from:

LISTERS: A Glimpse Into Extreme Birdwatching

https://youtube.com/watch?v=zl-wAqplQAo

1.9m view | 2mo ago | 2hr long (buckle in, documentary by a couple young goofball brothers)


I want something more gamified. I want to go on missions or complete challenges or something. Not just identity and log stuff.


I'll think of ways to bridge the virtual world with the real world birding one. Let me know if you have any ideas for that :)


I spent some time consulting over the last few years. So many companies are laying off their US engineering teams and replacing them with offshore teams. There used to be this notion that offshore meant lower quality but it doesn't seem like that as much these days. I've worked with some Ukrainian teams for example. They're 20% the price of Americans, produce the same quality, work harder, and speak great English. It seems like a no-brainer to go offshore.


There is an eternal cycle between uncomfortable and productive and comfortable and lazy.

15-20 years ago SWE work was brutal and paid OKish, but not great if you calculated the hourly.

Then the era of free VC money came, culminating in the pandemic boom, where people were crash coursing JavaScript to land a remote job doing 4 hours of work a week for $170k.

The pendulum is now swinging in the other direction.


Before the first dotcom era, software jobs paid like most other professional office jobs. Decent money but nothing really remarkable.

With the dotcom boom and VC money, that changed. I doubled my salary going to a startup in 1998. I was not a better developer all of a sudden, it was just that startups had piles of money and investors demanding that they spend it.

15-20 years ago software development was still very well paid compared to 30 years ago. And then the really insane FAANG money started flowing.


> I was not a better developer all of a sudden, it was just that startups had piles of money and investors demanding that they spend it.

That's not the whole story, though. The Internet inherently changed the value prop for software work, where a small number of engineers could support a huge number of users. That leverage makes software work inherently waaaay more profitable than it was pre-Internet, which is why companies could afford to throw gobs of money at top engineering talent.


So much fantasy landing in the comments here.

I worked in software 15-20 years ago. The work was not "brutal". I worked hard, but mostly because I enjoyed the work. I lived in a major American city and my pay was essentially the highest pay you could get outside of professions requiring professional degrees like doctor or lawyer, or some high finance positions. And even then, I made more than some doctors in lower-tier specialties.


I've seen AI successful used in big companies for improving matching algorithms and writing custom email alerts (as opposed to a single template).

I think the good uses of AI are places we don't even realize AI is being used.


I don't personally see much audience for non-JS websites other than headless web crawler. It's good for SEO but otherwise why bother?

I actually intentionally put some content behind JavaScript because AI crawlers see enough of the page to reference it as a source but not enough of the answer to provide the answer without linking to my site. I get decent traffic from AI bots as a result.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: