Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | matt3210's commentslogin

I bet a lot of the tokens go unused each month. The per token cost is pretty high for the api access

Dang! Very nice!

Is that a pi with a gfx card or a gfx card with a pi attached?

Yes.

Also, it doesn't seem like it would be all that much more expensive for these high end GPUs to start getting x86/64 SoCs with midrange specs baked in, and these AIO GPUs could be tailor made for standalone AI and gaming applications. If it's the equivalent of a $10 bit of gear in terms of cost, they could charge an additional $100 for the feature, with a SoC optimized for the specs of the GPU - get rid of the need for an eGPU altogether and stream from the onboard host?


Congratulations, you have invented AMD Instinct, except without the $100 part!

Sounds intriguing

This is very much a “would you like some coffee with all of your cream?” situation.

A previous company I worked for is San Francisco was very anti remote, but they announced on linked in that they are ok with remote engineers suddenly. It seems it’s still a workers market at least in SF. I’d AI could do it or even reduced head count I don’t think that would be the case.

I think a practical measure still useful right now, which does capture a lot of the "non-performance" capabilities of an employee, is as follows:

"Why has my job not been outsourced yet, since it is far cheaper?" Those are probably the same reasons why AI won't take your job this year.

Raw coding metrics are a very small part of being a cog in a company, which is not me saying it will never happen. Just me saying that thos focus on coding performance kind of misses the forest for the trees.


The adoption of AI tools for software development will probably not result in sudden layoffs but rather on harder to measure changes, like smaller teams being able to tackle significantly more ambitious projects than before.

I suspect that another kind of impact is already happening in organisations where AI adoption is uneven: suddenly some employees appear to be having a lot more leisure time while apparently keeping the same productivity as before.


what company?

Speak for yourself, I plan to live forever


— Riker (TNG, Generations)


You will. Not you you. But you.


Ubisoft does


Public transportation in a lot of places isn’t safe especially when traveling with women or children


Women and children aren’t inherently dangerous. If you just avoid eye contact and keep to yourself, you should be fine


This is just simply not true, not if you compare apples to apples. Cars are the most dangerous form of transportation and nothing even comes close. You're 100x more likely to die in a car above the subway in NYC than on the subway. Thats not an exaggeration, that's the actual figure.

And then people invariably talk about theft or getting beat up, forgetting that most car accidents don't kill, they injure. And they're extremely expensive.

Cars might FEEL safer because you're in a little box away from everyone else. But it's the exact same everyone else. Still the same amount of crazies and sociopaths.

Except now, they're also in little steel boxes that weight 2,000 pounds going faster than any human was ever meant to go. And they're in full control.


Must not be enough cops to either stand around and do nothing or beat the wrong guy to death then.


Taxing only the users of a good or service sounds reasonable


There are many indirect users of roads.

If you rely on businesses, services, emergency workers, etc., you rely on roads.


For only 3x the cost


Not if you optimize the context


I (and most people I ask) definitely don’t answer calls from robots or watch videos with robot voice. I’m not sure what value the customer gets here.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: