Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nothercastle's commentslogin

Being smart isn’t enough need resources and need to deal with people

They never made sense to have but I’m sure someone made a huge career and got lots of bonuses for this initiative

John Mackey, the founder of Whole Foods, mentioned at the end of his autiobiography The Whole Story that that there wasn't much collaboration within the higher-ups at Amazon. From the gist of it, I wouldn't be surprised if the internal retail division was trying to outshine the Whole Foods division by throwing technology at everything, useful or not, because that's what Amazon corporate appreciates.

We need a Google replacement that’s actually regulated. Euro Google is the only way for that to happen

If you want regulations, try Baidu. They get rid of non-government-approved thoughts really quick.

The free speech absolutism rethoric from the USA is getting pretty old, especially since you don't practice it yourselves.

The unregulated monopoly that is google has really served us well too. Instead of non-government-approved thoughts we get SEO slop, sponsored links, AI overviews, mass data collection, listicles, and unhelpful search results. Seems like both extremes aren’t good right? Maybe don’t be disingenuous?

Just buy a MacBook. The value is far And above comparable windows computers


Seems like a huge waste of resources hunting down rich peoples art for little gain


I think they want it to work well with web search. That’s why Google is the obvious choice. Also their ai offering is low risk of getting eliminated where as open ai could fail at any time


The problem is that’s ai is monetizing your code And not giving you anything


AI is also likely not following the terms of the license. I.e., for BSD it needs to include attribution.


So? If some other riser used my code to make money sould I be upset? Isn't it the whole point to me useful to others?


Some AI companies have jobs where human coders solve algo problems for model training.

Why not apply directly to those jobs and doing it for free? That would maximize your usefulness to others, would it not?

I'm actually asking, that's not a rhetoric question.


It would not, actually, maximize my usefulness to others. They way you do it is making your work maximally available and exapndable so others can build on it. The end result is greater than the sum of its parts. So... open source.

My point is that I don't see a reason why someone making money off my work that I donate should bother me. But again, this is MY stance, clearly it's not an universal outlook. What I wanted to challenge was underlying assumption that someone making money off your code and not giving you any back is a problem or that is _should_ be a problem. It might bother some, but it's not an universal assumption.


Trying to break out of the trade group monopoly won’t be easy and Texas graduates will get punished for it.


they aren't doing that...they are just changing who is in charge of the trade group.


It will come down to who has the most money for campaign contributions.


Most because it’s hard to quantify how much money they don’t earn because we refuse to shop there due to everything being locked up


A sandwich shop can’t be a bakery but a bakery can make sandwiches it’s the other way around. A bakery needs scale, subway can reheat ok bread but they will never have scale to make their own or make great bread. Bread needs to be fresh for best results. Sandwich ingredients are stable and easily procured. A sandwich shop Benifits from a good layout but can do without. A bakery needs heavy production equipment that is not easily replaced.


I think Jimmy John's does a good job making excellent bread. I'm not sure that it is bakery quality, but it is definitely noticeable. I've bought their day-old bread instead of grocery store baked bread. I think Subway's bread is pretty good, too, except they skimp on the flour.


The aroma of bread being baked is a glorious delight, yet somehow whenever a Subway is baking the smell gives me nausea and I can’t even go near the shop. Yes, it is edible and inoffensive once baked; I have no idea what they do to make the baking process smell so badly.


Yes, I used to live in a building that had a 24-hkur Subway connected to the lobby. The subway fart was omnipresent.


> but they will never have scale to make their own or make great bread

Every time someone figures out how to do something that's subjectively graded at scale the definition of "great" changes because a large part of it is partly based on exclusivity and a smaller part is based on frequency/familiarity (i.e. people get sick of or discount the subjective quality of things they encounter with frequency).


Bakers needs a minimum amount of Volume that is greater than 1 sandwich shop. So a chain sandwich place might be able to Support a bakery but not just one.

The optimal quality model is for a sandwich place to contract out with a bakery for perfect bread but barring that a bakery can make great bread and ok fillings and still make decent sandwiches.

Think apple silicon at TSMC model for optimal quality results, intel model for good enough results.

The best sandwich shops will not make their own bread because it’s a lot easier to iterate without a bakery and 100 sandwiches shops can fail at relatively low cost for the one great one to shine. Capital costs on bakeries are much higher so you can’t just iterate in bulk. But you can get good enough at the bakery.


>subway can reheat ok bread but they will never have scale to make their own or make great bread

They uh, literally did, 25 years ago. Breadmaking at Subway scale requires a single large mixer, some countertop space, some proofing racks, an oven, and a few hours at certain times.

Like, lmao bakeries are tiny! They have been premier examples of small business for basically all of human history! It's something you can just drop into the morning setup if your food business has any interest at all in "fresh" ingredients or higher quality like the vast majority of small businesses try to focus on. It scales down extremely well, which is why Kitchenaide does great business in their "Pro" series of mixers.

In fact, 25 years ago, the New England grocery store chain Hannaford also had a fully functional and running in house bakery, including in their small stores. Fresh baked bread and pastries and cakes and baked goods every single day.

Both companies have switched out the process without actually switching out or removing the required hardware (they both still have the racks and ovens and still install them in new locations!) to one where the bread is made in a distribution hub and sent out frozen.

It was an easy service to offer when Americans could afford to pay for that kind of thing because most Americans had fine jobs. But Subway can't afford the labor rates for someone who genuinely knows how to make fresh bread, because they have to/want to pay absolute bargain basement labor rates. Their business cannot survive if they priced their sandwiches in line with how much they were 25 years ago, with the same quality of ingredients they had 25 years ago.

Americans can't afford to pay american labor, which means fewer americans end up getting paid good labor rates, which means those americans can afford less, which means etc etc etc.

Meanwhile executive compensation has only ballooned. Gee whiz.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: