Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pampa's commentslogin

I didn't think that there was something wrong with my git workflow, or that git was complicated. I switched from darcs as my primary VCS to git around 2007. I was skeptical about jj at first but gave it a try. Did not look back ever since.

My impression is, that git is ok for managing shared history. And thats what i was using it for mostly. But jj added another whole dimension for managing my work in progress, different paths of code that i am working on in the moment. jj made it almost frictionless. I did not know I was missing it, but i'm not going back.


I think there was a prop 65 warning on a box of kreg pocket screws (or was it the jig?).


Take up the White Man's burden—

  Send forth the best ye breed—
Go bind your sons to exile

  To serve your captives' need; 
To wait in heavy harness

  On fluttered folk and wild—
Your new-caught, sullen peoples,

  Half devil and half child.
(...and six more verses)

- Rudyard Kipling


Not sure I follow. Running a country right off a cliff is not helping anyone in the country.


Is a well known racist poem praising colonialism.

Trying to bring the racist card to the discussion maybe; but "they don't help us because they are racists" is a dusty and very worn out argument at this moment.


> "they don't help us because they are racists"

That is not what i meant when posting the poem.

When someone asks "Why is every western government not warning Pakistan...", he is basically rephrasing Kipling and asking to "Take up the White Man's burden".

This has been attempted before, didn't go so well. That might give a clue, why we are in the current state of affairs.


> Why is every western government not warning Pakistan..

Because is not the duty of governments to teach science to other governments.

Science is a whole humanity project (not just a western one), and we publish our work for free, so is available to everybody, everywhere. Anybody can adopt this knowledge without asking to western countries.


> This has been attempted before, didn't go so well. That might give a clue, why we are in the current state of affairs.

Pakistan running itself off a cliff is not going well either.


I mean, the current state of Pakistan is due to widespread support for corrupt politicians by US and other powers in 1950s and onwards.


> Pakistan running itself off a cliff is not going well either

I mean, it's not going terribly either. For a nuclear-armed nation, that is.


I agree with your last paragraph but unfortunately I think you needed to provide that context with the original post. Many American and British conservatives use it non-ironically because they do see the condition of former colonial countries as proof that the people there aren’t fit to govern themselves.


There is some life in Rails, but new greenfield rails projects are rare. It is mostly legacy stuff now.

The ecosystem is slowly fading away. Big industrial libs are still good, but a lot of smaller projects are abandonware, last updated in 18-19.

The cool kids moved on to Go, Rust, TS, Elixir etc.


It always puzzled me why Crystal didn't catch up?

It seems like they just had to publish couple of benchmarks and articles here and there and that could have been it.

As it has good C interop story it could have a good chance riding on AI hype wave few years later in this alternative history.


Crystal had a bit of a slow start. It was promising, but the deployment issues persisted longer than they should have, and by the time they were fixed, you had other toolchains that filled the same niche. Elixir did "ruby" better than crystal OR ruby did.

I really wanted to like Crystal, and used it for a few projects. But the immaturity and timing was it's kryptonite.


> It always puzzled me why Crystal didn't catch up?

M:N wasn't added until late 2019 :( -- https://github.com/crystal-lang/crystal/pull/8112


Because there's not enough differences/advantages compared to Go.


Metaprogramming, null safety, syntax familiarity (with Ruby), algebraic types - there are quite a lot of advantages/differences, no?


I’m not sure if it changed, but Crystal was limited to a single core which I imagine made it easier to choose Go over Crystal.

That and I’ve found that folks often aren’t very receptive to Ruby like syntaxes initially.


This thread's context is large rails userbase around 2008'ish (people were changing computers from pcs to macs with textmate to do rails, perception of devs changed from nerds to cool kids - the whole thing was quite huge) that dissolved substantially. Crystal's syntax in this context feels like huge wasted/missed opportunity.


This claim seems to be supported by Google Trends [1]

Rails has been on a downward trend for the last 6 years.

[1] https://trends.google.co.in/trends/explore?cat=958&date=2017...


Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?

I mean 180+ commits, 3 month old, bold claims and already 8 releases on rubygems?

There ought to be a vetting/voting process for packages, before they are accepted into a public repo and pollute the global namespace. Like in arch repo/AUR.


All fungi are edible! Tho some you can eat only once.


To think of it - we are a food for fungi too!


Once i had an idea: instead of styrofoam or packing peanuts just use pop corn or puff rice. Thermal insulation, shock absorbent and biodegradable! Not sure about flame resistant. Also reusable. Make a mash, add some amylase and yeast and you can distill biofuel. Win-win.

EDIT: (fungal aspect) seed it with the right spores for container shipping and you get some free penicillin upon delivery!


It seems like it would be impossible to prevent bugs and rodents from getting into packages in facilities that process packages if there was this much free food available.


This is the main issue with things like popcorn and other foodstuffs: Insects and other pests truly love it. Suddenly, you have an insect problem in places that don't have food.


Perhaps it might be feasible were the goods properly sealed? I feel like it would require every step between production to shipment which would require clean environments- that might not be necessarily cost effective, but it is definitely an interesting idea. I would certainly prefer that all packaging be substituted for nontoxic sustainable and compostable materials- it seems doable, additional steps notwithstanding.


Packing peanuts are often made out of corn starch. The problem is how the packaging comes from the receiver to a sensible use.


And these are totally edible! I've popped a bunch in my mouth.


I've had stuff delivered to me packed with actual pop corn. Don't remember what it was, but a small object.


Indeed - the packing peanuts use case and styrofoam use case are very different! Former is already solved by starch (dunno why polymer peanuts still exist, maybe we should ban them), latter seems a great deal harder, that's the claim made in OP's link.


Just licked mario + rabbids I got yesterday. Tastes ok.


A chapon is a castrated cock. That might offend animal rights activists!


We can always switch to Qeng Ho time units, since we all kind of already using them now anyway.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: