Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pyotrgalois's commentslogin

In some way this article by one of Erlang creators is related to your comment: https://armstrongonsoftware.blogspot.com.ar/2008/05/road-we-...

> The fundamental problem with taking a remote operation and wrapping it up so that it looks like a local operation is that the failure modes of local and remote operations are completely different.


I think of Erlang less as making remote operations masquerade as local ones, and more as forcing you to assume that all local code has the potential failure-modes of remote code. Which, often (for weird and roundabout reasons) it does.


This.


Very insightful!


Armstrong clearly sees the problem. I understand his solution as: Erlang makes local and remote actors indistinguishable, but you should build your own custom wrapper for remote calls.

This seems fishy to me. You build low-level boilerplate over a high-level foundation? To clarify, I consider implementing the timeout as "low-level" and a mechanism like "link(remote_process)" as "high-level".


Could you please explain why do you think a timeout would be low level?


Yes, an i3 inspired one: https://github.com/SirCmpwn/sway


Two great books:

- "Functional Programming in Scala" by Paul Chiusano and Rúnar Bjarnason

- "Big Data: Principles and best practices of scalable realtime data systems" by Nathan Marz and James Warren


I just looked over the first chapter or so of "Big Data" that's online with the intent of purchasing it yesterday. It seemed decent enough.

What were you general thoughts on it?


You are right. Sorry for that. I will add the link.


This is really awesome. I hope to go again one day to SF and stay some days at HackerSurfing.


Yes, 3 or 4 times. I am from Argentina.


Probably because many of us had the same issue: no easy way to create google hangout with a link to share where anybody can join. After creating the page with the google hangout api somebody mentioned a link to resolve the issue I/we had. Since it is very likely that many do not know about the link or do not want to learn it, I think the webpage is useful. It is something very simple and stupid, but it is useful enought, at least for me.


As I said in other comments sometimes on hipchat I need to have a call with teammates that I do not have on gmail/hangouts. So I need to create a hangout with a link to share so that I can copy it into hipchat and anybody can join it. There is no way to do that on gmail. You need to open google plus that takes a while to load, then you need to go to the bottom right corner and wait for the Start video chat button to appear and finally click it.

I was not aware that there was a link (https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_) that lets you create a hangout with a link to share so that other people can join it. So I created a simple landing page with a button created with google hangouts api. After learning about the link I mentioned before, I changed the google hangout button by a normal link.


As I said in other comments sometimes on hipchat I need to have a call with teammates that I do not have on gmail/hangouts. So I need to create a hangout with a link to share so that I can copy it into hipchat. There is no way to do that on gmail. You need to open google plus that takes a while to load, then you need to go to the bottom right corner and wait for the Start video chat button to appear and finally click it.

I was not aware that there was a link (https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_) that lets you create a hangout with a link to share so that other people can join it. So I created a simple landing page with a button created with google hangouts api. After learning about the link I mentioned before, I changed the google hangout button by a normal link.


You got it


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: