Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | raghav305's commentslogin

3750


I think you had it coming .. as many may have pointed out already, the first response from the CSR was "to the point" - i.e. you asked a specific question - and you got an exact answer.

Maybe you didn't like the answer.

So, you resorted to using uppercase words (TERRIBLE).

And you were not given a NO for a service request - you had a question for which the answer was, rightly, NO!.. What else do you expect - a No with an apology attached?

Ideally, you should have responded to the CSR's first reply with a "Thanks for your response ... I would suggest you to strongly consider .. <blah> as it is already a norm and most competitors offer this ... " etc.

Instead, it appears that you took offense ... and well.. it was just downhill for you from there wasn't it :)

I also think the CSR didn't step out of bounds any time ... if this thread is reviewed by his supervisor, he/she would probably get a certificate of appreciation for handling an irate customer.


:)


you'll find such clauses in every license agreement. There is also one where they say the US Govt. has rights to all your data or some crap like that.


cigarette lighter


planning to phish?


yo! .. wht next !?


dead link bro..



can you pls invite me .. raghav305@gmail.com


You should request for your Right-To-Information and find out if your google search trends are being used by facebook and sue them both.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: