Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | runsfromfire's commentslogin

Can anyone recommend documentaries about pre-Triassic life? I’ve seen the “Ancient Earth” short-form series, and keep up with PBS’s “Eons” on YouTube, but I still feel like this is a facet of earth’s history that is rarely discussed in science media.


Yep - same story here with Nuke (the old one, but then it happened again on the new one too). Got to global and it was a ghost town save for the same 5 man we ran into every night.


Interesting that you call out his lack of data/sources, assert he is wrong, and don’t provide any sources of your own.

It seems like zip code is a good indicator of public education quality, though. Here’s an actual source if you’d like to read about it: https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/2019...

If you’re curious about wealth impact on public schooling quality, see table 1 for a clear breakdown.


>If you’re curious about wealth impact on public schooling quality, see table 1 for a clear breakdown.

We weren't talking about wealth of households, we were talking about the amount of funding that goes into poorer areas vs richer areas.

I'm not sure you actually understand the charts you're sharing. What you linked shows an expected correlation between student performance (as well as teacher quality, both of which are combined to give schools an A+ score), and being in an area with more expensive homes.


while the lectures in they were encoding would definitely look fine with these settings, I have to question your baseline for quality if you’re watching full Hollywood movies encoded at CRF 30.


I'm watching these on my second monitor when I play guitar.


Isn’t that the recommended starting point for AV1? What’s an appropriate high quality starting point?


there isn’t an easy answer, as it’s always going to be dependent on the source you’re encoding from. That said, in my experience anything higher than CRF 25 on AV1 is noticeably compressed, even to a layman. I mostly work in 1080 and occasionally 2160, though.

i can’t remember the last project i worked on in native 720 (probably circa 2009?) and even now 720 is only part of my output pipeline if specifically requested by the client.


With respect, they said pollution is the icky part. I’m not aware of any major industries that are responsible for an appreciable amount of CO2 emissions and no other pollutants/icky stuff, but I’d love to be proven wrong about that.


why isn’t that an accomplishment? who are you to decide what other people get validation from?


i’m sorry, i just don’t understand what you’re trying to say. you’re happy that the leading AI firm is full of shit despite promises to the opposite? what makes you happy about that?


I'm happy other people can see what has been obvious to me from day one.

It's not just schadenfreude (which I admit is unattractive, if beguiling.)

It also gives me hope that ordinary people are beginning to get to grips with the idea that they don't have to accept or be excited for new technologies just because they are new technologies, and that the people bringing new technologies don't have to be good people just because they are capable people. Seemingly smart people can be intellectually and morally lazy.

I have no obligation as a techie person to be excited about AI, or to be default-positive about the "leading firm", or to give the benefit of the doubt, or anything like that. There's no moral rule that one should be positive about new technology until it's proved bad. This is a classic tech industry false belief.

OK so the fall is not happening as quickly as Juicero. But it's a start.

What's your case for why should I not be happy?


They're gloating about being right about SV tech culture. Being right about the heel turn is some cold comfort, I guess.

But parent shouldn't feel too proud of their prognostication skills. OpenAI is a venture of Sam Altman and Elon Musk, so how could it be anything other than what it is? You'd have to be insanely naive about SV (and, more broadly, what "non profits" of billionaires in any sector even are) to assume this was ever born of altruism.


I'm not gloating. I'm just enjoying the spectacle.

I also don't profess surprise at who OpenAI have turned out to be. Rather I am surprised that other people are surprised.

It's not a heel turn, except in their wider cultural fortunes. It has been obvious to me from literally day one that everything to do with DALL-E and ChatGPT and onwards is bad for culture. There has never been anything other than creepy, dystopian, Black Mirror overtones.

But the valley falls for hucksters every time. And it's often the same hucksters.


> You'd have to be insanely naive to assume this was ever born of altruism.

Yet the vast, vast majority did and a still large proprtion continue to proclaim that these projects were born of altruism and continue to serve these altruistic goals and these people are most incredible altruistic humans to ever grace this fine planet of ours.


“So long and thanks for all the yachts”


He wasn’t trying to convey the story you wanted him to convey so it’s poor filmmaking?

I’m not sure I understand your position. He’s a bad filmmaker because you preferred the book’s ending?


Would you expect the PR to cater to, and speak extensively about third party hardware?


Not just third-party, but pre-existing solutions. The PR is announcing what's new, it's that simple.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: