I think some pythonistas maybe got their feeling hurt by your comment causing it to grey out.
Over the last 25 years in the SaaS world, I have never seen python evolve into a system that is easy to reason about and debug. It lets you do too many things. In over 30 cases, I have seen teams deliver better software faster in Go after replacing their Python.
I've used both professionally. I think elixir has some amazing ideas. I love pattern matching. However! Just like all other interpreted languages, in elixir, I have to go to the call sites of the function that I am editing to understand what it is that is actually available and to understand what I can edit. I don't know what has been passed into my function. The lack of types is not fixed by having a type spec and dialyzer. Pattern matching helps. I wish Go had it. But when it comes to a growing organization, more and more of the codebase cannot fit in your head, and I find that teams and organizations are indeed faster in Go.
I recall hearing that Jose was making progress on types. Not sure where that landed.
Oh my. Paste your stuff into ai and have an impartial conversation. You are not grounded in reality and I believe your views are dangerous because they rewrite truths into a package that has been and will continue to be used as a cudgel against others.
I challenge you to provide one thing that jesus introduced. It turns out, EVERYTHING he taught already existed. I can paste a table of data, but ai is cleaner and faster.
And democracy is _famously_ Greek. Over half six hundred years before Jesus lived.
His historical impact comes less from novelty and more from narrative power, charismatic delivery, and, later, institutional amplification. And it is largely Paul who should be credited for amplification.
You know that greek democracy had very little to do with what we called democracy in the west right?
Show me other religion that taught to love your enemies and survived to these days at the same time. Just a tiny example of why you totally miss the point by not seeing how innovative was his ethical approach for that time. And yes, one of his great achievements is that he succeeded to make those simple and already existed ideas popular. This is novelty by itself.
Brainwashed? Try pasting your comment into an AI and ask for an analysis. Your weak argument is selectively true, historically shallow, and ideologically motivated. It reflects apologetics. It's not reflective of serious history.
You have a whole world of truth you are willfully blind to judging by your comments.
I am a fan of Dr. Dan McClellan, who uses the slogan “data over dogma.” He’s best known for his work in biblical scholarship and for presenting religious topics with an emphasis on evidence-based interpretation rather than theological assumptions.
Either his book or online content will challenge your views, and if you are honest with yourself, likely change your theological dogma.
Yeah I was doing fine for the usual people going to the gym. I’d be last in a competition. I’m neither on steroids or an elite natural athlete. My point isn’t to say I’m weak, only that I’m not unusual for someone who went to the gym 5x per week and had a personal trainer/coach.
This legislation is very much giving more power to the government over what its citizens cannot do. The real impetus is control by the powers that be. The ideal citizen for an authoritarian would be fully controllable via digital means. A digital id that is networked with services is a wet dream for authoritarians.
What does this have to do with limiting Zuck's net worth? Because less kids will see less ads? How much will this reduce his net worth? If we took licenses from kids and had them wait until 18, would you be claiming this is to prevent Musk from gaining more wealth?
This is how it should be. If you happen to be 16 and look 19, well, fuck's sake, your body's old enough to drink now. People get so hung up on this kind of think-of-the-children crap like as though every generation before now didn't have plenty of underage drinking and debauchery. I'm more worried about people being shutins and not having any fun than I am about some kid having a beer.
is grit not required to make it to land in the survivorship bias pool? If your first failure is too hard on you and you quit, then, by definition, you can't succeed. Maybe grit doesn't count when everything goes your way always. I'm not sure anyone has experienced success without grit, but I could be entertained by anecdotes.
reply