Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | slazien's commentslogin

https://www.jmail.world/about

"We compiled these Epstein estate emails from the House Oversight Committee release by converting the PDFs to structured text with an LLM"

and:

"Data Sources

    Gmail emails: House Oversight Committee
    Yahoo emails: DDoSecrets (brought to us by Drop Site News)
Technology

Document parsing and extraction powered by reducto"


Yes, also many were PPM images (or encoded as such) in PDFs and then I used (cheap/light) multimodal LLMs to classify documents from photos. It was surprisingly cheap: <$1 for a few thousand PDFs / Images.

While this might be a marketing tactic in such situations, in this case it's a press release, which is a format where it's common to speak about "yourself" in 3rd person. Look at their other press releases.


That's fair, it's so reporters can copy paste it. But given the seriousness here it would seem the CEO could have written something more personal. Though of course it covers their ass legally as it doesn't admit or imply guilt, even hits it's a contractor's fault, and nobody can accuse them of not "responding" any longer.


For anyone interested in incorporating wild plants into their cuisine (including foraging, preparation, storage, recipes, etc.), I cannot recommend Samuel Thayer's books highly enough: https://www.foragersharvest.com/sams-books.html

At this point, he is an authority in the foraging community, and his books are well-written. Got all of them in my bookshelf.


OpenAI didn't provide the right type of evidence, so the trademark request got dismissed: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn97733259&docI... (probably until they try again).

Apparently, they... didn't even pay the petition fee


It was the "petition to make special" (something like a request to speed up the process) that was dismissed, not the trademark application.

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn97733259&docI...


Ah, good catch!


Related: me and my colleagues at Georgia Tech created something similar for multiple types of Points of Interest and developed and accessibility index. Our methodology was a bit different though: https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.06954


I wonder how widespread this phenomenon actually is, anyone has similar stories to share?


Extremely, and not just in tech. Most people just don’t want to admit it because most people need to feel like they “earned” their money. The reality that many, even most in some companies, people get paid simply to maintain a social system is a troubling thought for a lot of people.

You can easily work for a decade at some companies and contribute absolutely nothing if you know how to play the politics.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: