I read their pitch as trying out multiple agents to do the same task and then pick your favorite approach

I might get this with ui/styling experimentation. But shouldn’t devs have an idea of what they’re building - the specific building blocks, logical, and data flows - before you prompt? I couldn’t imagine getting three different one shot attempts at an implementation and having to validate and read through each one.

Not everything will work the first time. You could try 3 approaches and immediately discard the ones that don't pass tests. (Which is likely to be 1-2 of them)

On the flip side, our SaaS runs primarily on GCP so our users are fine. But our billing and subscription system runs on AWS so no one can pay us today.

CodeRabbit has GA'd its support for AI code reviews directly in your terminal. CodeRabbit CLI agent works with your coding agent (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, etc.) and allows you to automate code reviews and bug fix right as you are building in your CLI.

To get started, run this command in your terminal ask your coding agent to run CodeRabbit reviews: curl -fsSL https://cli.coderabbit.ai/install.sh | sh

This is old news at this point.

Even louder horns and even brighter headlights. Its like everyone is trying to blind all other drivers at night.

The real warning sign (like flashing red lights x100) will be when potential AI Inra unicorn startups start delaying their IPOs or their public stock fails to rally after IPO

Yup, 100%. At some point there won't be any more private money so we'll start to see a flood of AI ipo's but eventually that will dry up too. We'll see it happen so be ready. My guess is that OpenAI's IPO will be the start of the no more private money cycle.

Or when they decide to stay private and hoover stupid money from Gulf states and SoftBank and don't get any. When the guy who thinks Neom is a good idea is not parted from his money, then it's really over.

Hey folks - just wanted to share that CodeRabbit recently shipped AI code reviews for Cursor, Windsurf and VS Code.

In order to have code reviews fit seamlessly into the daily coding work in the editor we had to completely rebuild our AI code review agent so that we could fast, and accurate code reviews in the editor.

Objective was to review every code change well before the PR is raised so that there are fewer comments and back-and-forth in the PR.

Would love to hear your feedback on how we balanced code review quality with speed of delivering review comments.

Hey folks - just wanted to share our announcement that CodeRabbit now runs in the IDE bringing free AI code reviews in the code editor.

No more context switching when conducting code reviews. Developers can maintain their flow state and get immediate feedback on committed or uncommitted changes. Reduces clutter in the PR as well to get your code reviewed before the PR is raised. No cost to run code reviews in the IDE (with some rate limits).

Shouldn't take more than a few minutes to install the CodeRabbit plugin. Would love to hear your feedback.

I couldn’t think of an agency that has delivered a better ROI than NASA.

Not sure who gets ultimate credit for the internet NSF/CERN/DARPA, but that has to be a contender for the best return, right?

Also impossible to measure public health research/initiatives: polio, measles, pasteurization, whatever ended up killing Thomas Midgley, etc.

Every big company i have worked at (2) didn't really reach out to anyone from my previous job to verify my details. Every startup I've worked at (3, all early stage) did extensive background verification on all my claims. Guess the risk for early stage startups getting a new hire wrong is more pronounced.