I wonder how much of the people that are being upset about an option that recognizes landmarks and that is build in a privacy minded way are using chatGTP, windows, google or socials
The writer of the post admits that he doesn’t understand the very tech lite explanation of Apple nor read about Apple AI in general and the way it was setup. A lot of people are upset that (maybe, but unlikely) Apple knows that you made the 10 billionth photo of the Golden Gate Bridge. But continu using all sorts of services, living in sec camera heavy cities etc.
Not an apple fan but from all big tech corporations they have the least amount of interest in mining user data from a business perspective
>>Not an apple fan but from all big tech corporations they have the least amount of interest in mining user data from a business perspective
I think it's more that they realised they couldn't beat google at that game and hoped to see personal or governmental push back like GPDR in the EU that would then give them an advantage. Which would then give them an advantage. The day they stop having that belief they will invade your privacy.
there are many types of a wrong answer, and the difference is based on how the answer came to be. In case of BS/Hallucination there is no reason or logic behind the answer it is basically, in the case of LLM, just random text. There was no reasoning behind the output or it wasn't based on facts.
You can argue if it matters how a wrong answer came about ofc but there is a difference
I get the idea but the "science" is based on reports it doesn't look like this has been tested with actual malware. Would be interesting to know how well it works
Also make it OSS and ask for donations. Not sure what your feature earning model is but is seems easy to replicate and as point out several times right now it asked to blindly thrust you
It’s about as shit as the 300k lines of c code. Added with drink spilling acceleration in 12.3.6 for no reason at all.
There are major improvements in taking a curve and not scaring the shit out of the driver, much faster basic turn right on stop sign, lane changes when it does it, it’s hard to describe just how smooth they are it’s a little nuts the car just floats over it’s not human, but it really should not have changed lane most of the time… so decision logic is shit. Etc.
And that's the whole problem with it - there isn't really any 'decision logic', it's a giant low level neural network trained on the outputs of human drivers. It understands driving less than GPT understands semantic concepts in language. There's no 'executive' high level control, it's just a big stupid animal brain that reacts to stimuli like 'turn left ahead' or 'car ahead slowing down'.
you properly mean the average user. The average user would not download this browser. so the user of ladybird might want to live with the shortcomings. That being said , Firefox still exists and is a very good cross platform OSS browser
e91 was a very nice car to drive the f36 is the first car that I modified because it didn't driver that well. changed the suspensions and now drivers in some ways nearly as good as the e91 and in other ways better
I owned a 325xi e91 and didn't experience any turn signal problems, same for my current 420i F36. Lot of German cars (VW, Audi etc) have a two stage turn signal. A light bump will do 4 or so signals and automatically stops if you move the stalk all the way it wil stay there until you move it back.
to me the sound is loud enough to hear it but not so loud it is annoying
I have tried a bunch of these fonts and other tools. But for me zooming in, making the font bigger and/or using reading mode is the best solution for me. By making the font bigger the sentences get shorter and it easier to read.
The writer of the post admits that he doesn’t understand the very tech lite explanation of Apple nor read about Apple AI in general and the way it was setup. A lot of people are upset that (maybe, but unlikely) Apple knows that you made the 10 billionth photo of the Golden Gate Bridge. But continu using all sorts of services, living in sec camera heavy cities etc.
Not an apple fan but from all big tech corporations they have the least amount of interest in mining user data from a business perspective