thanks Prakash. Come and log-in again dude. Code releases every day, we are trying to make it better for everyone.

http://www.viewsflow.com/ is my thing--good explanation of what we are trying to do. I admit that we don't do a great job on the site right now--i am working on that as we speak.

The plan is this: * watch thousands of people sharing content through Tw, Del, Fb, etc. * build up an influence model--who is a good discriminator on stuff about China? Or about tech industry? * present an aggregated view of what the 'top discriminators' recommend in each of the fields they are genuinely good at * anyone can become an expert--based on how good your content recommendations are (as evaluated by our algorithms) * make it bigger

the community stuff is teetering around--hasn't yet taken off. we have some ideas about how to make it take off, and am open for your suggestions.

I really like the different take on how you guys are solving the "what to read" problem. Keep up the good work. Ping me, I'd love to chat.

He is using the wrong equation. His problem is not to do with being in stochastic hell. It is his search strategy. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_problem

Hey congrats scott. that is brilliant news

I use SleepCycle. Can't tell you if it is a sham or not-- it seems to work and seems to reflect my subjective assessments of my nights sleep

Yep. And you can count the leverage at every single level