If you plan to watch most of your movies in 4K, you probably should wait about 10 years before buying a new TV... the movie industry doesn't adapt very quickly and cable compresses everything so much that you can't even get true 1080 even if they say that they have HD
Really, for video, 1080p is absolutely fine, if the video is not over-compressed. Even around 20mbps, 4k won't look better than 1080p, for full-motion full-color video content.
For small text and fine lines such as used in a close-up computer monitor, 4k+ can be very beneficial. But for video, it's marketing, and a costly waste.
I have rented lots of Blu-rays and never found one that was upscaled from DVD to 1080p. Can you provide more details please since I am having a hard time believing that's true.
I did a quick Google search and found this article [1] ... I recall seeing a website that was listing Blu-ray titles with true-1080p but I can't find it right now. Cable does something similar by highly compressing HD content.
Why wait? Sure, some content will be overly compressed, but there is great 4K content available now:
1) Most digital photos are 4K - a 4K TV is ideal for viewing them.
2) Youtube videos
3) This video
4) Other sources of 4K video that are coming online right now.
Sure, you might not get 100% of the benefit of your 4K TV for ten years, but that doesn't mean it's not worthwhile.
In my case I had a terrible old TV, so upgrading was a no-brainer.
FWIW: The new Ultra HD Blu-Ray Disc format which supports 4K, HDR, and Dolby Atmos/DTS:X will launch soon (if you can still tolerate an optical medium). Watch for the new "Ultra HD Premium" logo on compatible devices.
I tried to convert my WP to Hugo after seeing your comment, using the WP's export plugin (https://github.com/SchumacherFM/wordpress-to-hugo-exporter) but so far my biggest problem is that the link references that were created in the export process don't seem to work properly, for example:
I didn't have to do migration, but there are aliases[0] for those who do. Again, I haven't used it so I'm kind of recommending something I haven't touched, but maybe it'll help you out.
that should be considered a backdoor, unless they make their findings about quantum computing public (the same goes for undisclosed "0-day" bugs that they discover).
This used to be a big thing, but since Check 21 and truncation that amount of money banks made has been severely marginalized. The big reason stems for risk.
The 2-3 allows the receiving FI to mitigate, IIRC, around 70% of the risk associated with the most popular types of rejects. (e.g. insufficient funds)
