I was not. It was quite absurd. I'm glad you agree.

The piece doesn't advocate for anyone to sell shares. It's actually positive about both Tesla and BTC.

It doesn't have to do that to accomplish the objective I'm trying to point out. All it seeks to actually do is associate its targets with religion. I believe this is part of a long smear. I can't prove that, of course, but I think this possibility is obvious to anyone that can read between the lines.

Hopefully a more nuanced view would come out of reading the piece.

There's a tendency to refer to Peloton as a "religion" or Lululemon as a "cult."

They're not. But we may overlook the new, spiritual organizations that are being born.

Bitcoin and Tesla bear the markings of genuine religious denominations.

A $6 billion fund tried to take down one of my pieces.

They tried to claim terms and concepts like "compounders" and "good to great" were proprietary.

This is the story of the encounter.

Breaking down $SNOW and how they maintain their position v. Redshift, GCP, etc.

Look at the future of gaming and the Metaverse ahead of the IPO.