Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is just ad hominem. You might as well say "I am politically on the left and I don't like the Cato Institute". It would be more honest.

As an aside, the Cato Institute turned down a donation from Fannie Mae before the financial crash so as to avoid the appearance of bias in their advocacy, so I have a bit of respect for them. How many think-tanks would do the same?

Yes, they were founded with a gift from the Koch families decades ago, but does that invalidate the work of Michaels, who by all appearances is a climate scientist that has published real research? Should we dismiss his thoughts outright and not listen to what he has to say?

(Update: a link below shows 3/4 of Cato's annual funding comes from individual donations, only 2% comes from corporations. Presumably, the rest comes from non-profit foundations.)

Sorry, I accidentally up-voted you when attempting to do the opposite.



meta-note: I've noticed a tendency on HN for commenters to impeach people sometimes without good reason (this case may or may not be a good example, that's not the point) On several articles today the comments basically boiled down to an ad-hominem -- and this was on subjects as far-ranging as naval warfare, startups, science, etc.

I'd like to call it out more, but there's so much of it -- it's a lost cause, I think.


Unfortunately, it seems even more prevalent in the real world...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: