Isn't the likelihood of an Anon member infiltrating ISIS just was likely as a ISIS member infiltrating Anon?
This seems like a brilliant tactic.
1) Join Anon and provide "stolen" intel on low level terrorist plot
2) Gain confidence of respected entity (This Michael Smith guy?)
3) Create conduit to pass phony intel to feds to distract from real plans
Best of all, nobody will question your motive to stay anonymous.
Normally I wouldn't worry much about this as I am sure Intelligence agencies are working to verify intel and sources... but... are they?
This seems like a brilliant tactic.
1) Join Anon and provide "stolen" intel on low level terrorist plot 2) Gain confidence of respected entity (This Michael Smith guy?) 3) Create conduit to pass phony intel to feds to distract from real plans
Best of all, nobody will question your motive to stay anonymous.
Normally I wouldn't worry much about this as I am sure Intelligence agencies are working to verify intel and sources... but... are they?