Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I really find it absurd that stating facts is downvoted here on HN because it doesn't fit the hivemind. Singapore and Indonesia execute drug offenders and despite what I am told should happen in this thread, there is very little crime despite their crazier "War on Drugs". When compared to a country like Portugal, Singapore and Indonesia have far lower crime and drug use.


I think that what gets down-voted is more the implication that making drugs offences capital crimes is the chief reason Singapore and Indonesia have lower drug usage rates.

I believe that more significant influencing factors are that drug usage is socially unacceptable Singapore and Indonesia, that citizens are more willing to accept government control over their private activities, that drugs are harder to acquire.

It seems more likely that those countries are able to have capital punishment for (what the West would consider to be) minor drugs offences precisely _because_ drug use is already low and drug users are more consistently vilified by society.


Yeah, for evidence of the impact culture has, look at alcohol. In almost all countries it is treated similarly: after 16-18 years old, drinking is legal. Yet there are vast differences in addiction rates and per-capita consumption.


Execution is a very drastic drug-related harm. If we killed everyone at age 50 then cancer rates would fall drastically, but it would be completely unreasonable to suggest that we had effectively solved the cancer problem.

It is worth noting that Indonesia have changed their drug policies in recent years and are moving towards a medicalised rather than criminalised approach to drug use, largely as a response to rising rates of HIV infection amongst injecting drug users.

https://www.unodc.org/indonesia/en/issues/hiv-and-drugs.html


So in these countries is the number of executions per million population higher than the deaths in the USA, say, directly attributed to drug sale/use?


"Studies have consistently failed to establish the existence of a link between the harshness of a country's drug laws and its levels of drug use."

Quote from the article we're discussing.


I didn't downvote, but others may have downvoted because you didn't give any sources, and you don't expand on your statement. Yes, there are fewer drug users in Singapore and Japan, but they are historically and culturally extremely different to the USA.

I'm not convinced on Indonesia[1] and Hong Kong[2]; I've visited both myself several times, and drugs were easily available.

[1] http://jakartaglobe.beritasatu.com/news/bnn-says-33-die-of-d... [2] http://www.scmp.com/magazines/post-magazine/article/1826366/...


I downvoted you because you're simply wrong with a couple of those countries, for example in Hong Kong there's a plenty of drug users. The statistics just aren't reported like they are in some western countries.

Singapore only executes drug dealers, producers and traffickers. This hasn't really had a significant effect on drug availability, and it still remains a major transit point for drug trafficking in Asia.

Indonesia? Drugs everywhere.


Singapore is a police state. Execution is illegal in Portugal as it's a human rights violation. They're very different places.


In college I smoked weed over Skype with someone in Indonesia and their buddies. They didn't really go out of their way to buy it either.

It's probably very underreported (because otherwise they would be executing a ton of people).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: