Could provide a small counterpoint to pg's post-Kiko claim that, "The best solution for most startup founders would probably be to stay out of Google's way." (http://paulgraham.infogami.com/blog/kiko)
Interesting that where Google proves to be kind of soft is the product that actually creates all their revenue. Complacency as the market leader? Just a blip like the Google rep suggested?
This article gave me a lot of encouragement and heart, because they are based in New York and because they are out-hacking large, established players.
I agree with what Paul et al have written about the importance of being in a startup hub, but this article makes me think that if you are targeting a particular industry (like advertising), you might be able to find success by locating yourself wherever those industries are concentrated. Not as good as being in a hub, but an option for people who find themselves elsewhere.
It's also a perfect example of a small (comparatively tiny Quigo) company flying under large behemoths (Google and Yahoo) by being open, agile, and transparent.
Interesting that where Google proves to be kind of soft is the product that actually creates all their revenue. Complacency as the market leader? Just a blip like the Google rep suggested?