Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's its control system. What's interesting is that all of its actuators are soft. You can imagine that a set of simple soft components like that simple oscillator, combined with some small rigid components containing a microcontroller, would belike a full soft robot.


Some definitions of 'robot' require a sensor too?


In the broadest definition, a sensor is an object whose purpose is to detect events or changes in its environment, and then provide a corresponding output. [1]

If we follow the above definition given on the Wikipedia then some important and interesting issues arise:

Is sensor not a device that behaves in certain manner to some energy stimulus and thus allows us to connect outer energy to the autonomous system (robot) being developed?

Should a sensor always transduce to electronic energy form?

e.g. a gear lever in a bike is not a sensor? it senses (may be pressure) and thus allows the system (the bike) to sense some outside stimulus.

Please feel free to define sensor in a different manner if you disagree with [1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensor


I agree you can have completely non-electronic sensors. Case in point: the sensor wand on a Flying Moth sailboat:

http://www.sailmagazine.com/racing/regattas/learning-to-fly-...


Or, you know, eyes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: