Interesting post, but I would suggest coming up with an original logo, rather than using another company's world famous logo and slapping a ninja icon on it.
1. They used the same state emblems to create a completely different design.
2. Doesn't mean other people can use their "old" logo (which they're currently still using).
FWIW, I'm no fan of MOS (one of the reasons I posted is because they're notoriously litigious, even suing Spotify over the order of user playlists), but I'm also no fan of design work being so blatantly ripped off, particularly by companies that can easily afford to hand work to a real designer.
Actually, a lot of the force of your criticism disappears when you realise that they are both derivatives of governmental logos used in the UK -- not surprising since both bodies are British.
> they are both derivatives of governmental logos used in the UK
No they aren't. The MOS logo uses emblems of the British state (crown and portcullis) to create a design that's completely different from that of any British state institution, as demonstrated by your own example.
The logo of "Ministry of Testing" is not inspired by any Government emblem, it's literally just the MOS logo with one word changed and a ninja instead of a portcullis/speaker.
A company that makes $100k/month and brags about its "uber cool" design should be able to do better than that.
Since Indiehackers has now changed the URL of the Ministry of Testing logo, breaking it in the parent post (it's still on the Indiehackers page, with a new URL), here it is on Imgur, alongside the Ministry of Sound logo:
In case anyone thinks I broke the URL for nefarious reasons, it's actually because all assets are fingerprinted based on my last deploy, and I just deployed :)
Ministry of Sound logo:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/2/27/Ministry-of-s...
The logo this company (Ministry of Testing) is using:
https://www.indiehackers.com/images/business-icons/ministry-...