You posted a blog post by a Randian climate change denier who authored a book called The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels.
I'm assuming you just searched for the first article that tries to spin Apple's environmental efforts negatively and that you don't actually endorse anything he wrote.
If in fact you do, consider this: when you deposit cash in an ATM on one side of town and withdraw it from another on the other side of town, the cash may not be physically the same cash you deposited. Electrons work the same way.
<A lot of words attacking this author's character>
Do you actually want to address the point he makes, or the point i made (that we are talking about apple), or just want to character assassinate a person?
Because it seems a lot like the latter.
(If you consider him to be "not even worth discussing", then please do that instead of the character assassination, because it's not interesting, useful, or contributing to the discussion)
I'm assuming you just searched for the first article that tries to spin Apple's environmental efforts negatively and that you don't actually endorse anything he wrote.
If in fact you do, consider this: when you deposit cash in an ATM on one side of town and withdraw it from another on the other side of town, the cash may not be physically the same cash you deposited. Electrons work the same way.