Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

If a series of tweets can easily be put into a defined order for consumption then why not just lift the max character limitation and let people make tweets as long as they want? Seems like it’d be an easy slide down that slope once you’re on it.


There is no slope. Either the limitation is there, or it isn't. What comes after to call this a "slippery slope"?

And clearly the existing limitation is a pain in the ass, or else services that "unroll" multi-tweet text wouldn't exist. The limitation is completely arbitrary and clearly not entirely helpful, so a request to lift it is entirely reasonable.


I can easily imagine a series of changes that ultimately turns Twitter into something like Medium.


> Either the limitation is there, or it isn't.

Well, if you can compose multiple Twitter messages into a long one, the limitation is kind of just half there.


The difference is all about the contributors.

Each having a low limit, or one having a low limit makes for specific conversation dynamics.

Long form, or free form is a different thing.

Equating them is over simplifying both the request and dynamics in play.


Would that be an issue? The character limit is clearly a pain point for some users (graph here[1] of average tweet lengths -- many people abandon their tweets if they hit the limit), so why not alleviate it? Especially given that it doesn't appear to impact other users' behaviour: only 5% of users actually used the extra space during testing of the increase from 140 to 280 characters [2].

This discussion reminds me of when Instagram stopped enforcing that all pictures be square, a (mostly) ideological limit that made using the service harder.

[1] https://blog.twitter.com/official/en_us/topics/product/2017/...

[2] https://www.zdnet.com/article/twitter-opens-floodgates-on-28...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: