I wouldn’t do it until we had a way of enforcing the no-fluff rule - even more so than generic up/down voting. I wish there was an ArXiV for this type of knowledge.
The key challenge there is that while scientists are expected to produce papers and to review papers, product managers are not expected to do so.
We're expected to manage our products (which makes lots of sense), but that leaves us little time to curate a neutral and high-quality repository of product management knowledge.
While I've done my best to share my knowledge in my spare time (I've published 50+ articles at Product Manager HQ), I strongly believe there's a systemic challenge at play here.
Many of my colleagues are insanely good at what they do, yet they haven't written any articles on product management because that behavior isn't incentivized.
