It would probably push prices up, but the impact on individuals would depend on their non-basic income.
Say I earn nothing, then a UBI of $100/month comes in; I have increased my income by an infinite percentage.
Say I earn $10,000 and the same UBI comes in, I have increased my income by 1%.
This results in a general flattening of the income v. population percentile curve, effectively flatting out income differentials and promoting equality.
Things do go haywire if the governing thought is "everyone should get enough money to buy an X" in some scenario where there are Y people and (Y-1) Xs floating around. It doesn't matter how much money people have if there are not enough goods.
Adding value. Lets say there is something in your life that you care about and costs you $100 a month. If I find a way to provide you with the same value for $20 a month and manage to do it at a cost of $10 a month, if I can persuade you to do business with me, you get the same value for $80 a month less and I get $10 a month in profits. If I manage to convince 100,000 people to also save $80 a month, I get $10 * $100,000 or $1m a month - not by taking away from others, but by saving them money.
Of course, plenty of people get money in ways that doesn't align with this ideal, but as an entrepreneur, that's the way I think about things and I have no problem with receiving $1m a month if I do so by saving others money and/or providing them with goods or services that they choose to purchase and that makes them happy.
Those who have a monthly mortgage payment of $9000. Substract $500 (or more if the government doesn't help you with their costs) for each child in your household.
Say I earn nothing, then a UBI of $100/month comes in; I have increased my income by an infinite percentage.
Say I earn $10,000 and the same UBI comes in, I have increased my income by 1%.
This results in a general flattening of the income v. population percentile curve, effectively flatting out income differentials and promoting equality.
Things do go haywire if the governing thought is "everyone should get enough money to buy an X" in some scenario where there are Y people and (Y-1) Xs floating around. It doesn't matter how much money people have if there are not enough goods.