Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I've been a member of Forrst for a while and my enthusiasm has taken a nose dive in a past couple of months. The main problem is not the site design. It is the fact that Forrst is overrun with kids. "I am an aspiring 13 old designer, and here is something I did in a couple of hours because I was bored". That's not to say that are no gems in the feed, but these are typically cross-posts from Dribbble. Trying to build the designer and the developer community that is also friendly and helpful to the beginners is a noble undertaking. But it does not work. It is an utopia as it has very little appeal for professional designers and developers. Noobs wooting noobs on mediocre designs is not exactly a fostering environment. Still might work as an ad platform and a promotion vehicle of course.


I've always felt that the real good people don't have time for these secretive communities, they'd rather be doing shit so you'll always have the middle ground between mediocre and amazing. I'm sure the "best" (with regards to what they do) hackernews members rarely (if ever) comment because they're too busy being the best, you don't get to the top by talking about it.


This is sometimes true, sometimes not. I know a few amazing designers that are on Dribble all the time, because it's an outlet for fun things they're making that have nothing to do with client work.

By the same token, if you check out /leaders, lots of people at the top _are_ killing it. There are obviously tons of successful people that aren't on HN, but "commenting on HN means you're unsuccessful," is trivially disproven.


> but "commenting on HN means you're unsuccessful," is trivially disproven.

but I didn't even say that, you just pulled that quote out of thin air. Of course posting here doesn't make you unsuccessful, but if you are successful you're less likely to be posting here. I at no point claimed the former...


    but if you are successful you're less likely 
    to be posting here
Anything to back that up?


Sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you said that directly, just using quotes for grouping... maybe single quotes? Or just re-working the sentence?


I know a few amazing designers that are on Dribble all the time, because it's an outlet for fun things they're making that have nothing to do with client work.

This is also true of GitHub. But both GitHub and Dribbble are places where you show off evidence of your work. HN is more a talking shop.


I disagree that it has very little appeal, though it certainly has a more narrow focus in terms of to whom it does appeal. The type of post you mention is something we have been concerned about and working towards resolving. At the end of the day, I think Forrst can and does provide real value to professional designers and developers, but perhaps that is not able to shine through as much when such posts exist.


So the exclusive community that doesn't allow regular folks in has let in some bad neighbors? Good thing they have kept their walls up...

Good lesson there...


Could you elaborate a bit?


Lots of sites think they need to put up walls to maintain a sense of community.

History all across the Internet (and before the Internet) has shown this to be a fallacy.

Tragedies of the common are avoided by proper structure and accountability tools, not by erecting walls to keep people out.


You are over-generalizing, and more to the point - you are clearly neither a Forrst or Dribbble user. The difference in the quality of the content is very noticeable. To put it into a more sensible coordinate system, Dribble is a moderated mailing list, and Forrst is an unmoderated one. Or, better analogy perhaps would be hackers vs. script kiddies - do you know of many hangouts of former that tolerate (leave alone embrace) latter? Me neither.


History has always proven my statements to be right.

Changing human behavior in such a fundamental way is highly unlikely to happen from some technical limits put up on a website.

I don't need to be a part of those sites to know this.


I think the community is just getting started. People are figuring out what they want to use it for, and what it is best for, as the culture takes shape. Give it some time.

There's some great energy behind forrst - I have a lot of respect for Kyle, based on his mature stewardship, consistently friendly, positive attitude, and the care he has taken with the site.


I will agree with this on some level. Teenagers are a known community cancer. Left unchecked, they will turn any board into 4chan.

I don't think there is an uncontrollable flow of noobs on Forrst though. For the most part its follow-based anyhow, you don't like someone you unfollow them.

However I have noticed posts where highschool kids are specifically encouraged to participate, and while a really noble gesture to foster education amongst a new generation (and cheap labor pool), its a dangerous move. More kids = lower quality and more moderation.


Hah, excellent. I never even applied for membership as I didn't have any examples of what I have done online but always assumed this would be a somewhat stricter than "I made this in Photoshop". Not as excited about applying now.


yeah, I've been there a few times and every time I search for topics of my interest I see people bragging about stuff I don't even note in the commit message. meh. I mean, there are probably lots of professionals, but the environment and kiddie community encourages posting lots of minor stuff.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: