Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You have to understand: Spam is about economics. It's not about morals or freedoms or anything else. It's purely about money.

If the amount it costs a spammer to spam is strictly less than his earnings from spam + profit, then he'll continue spamming. Every time Balsam wins a judgment, it goes in the cost column, thereby eating into the spammers' profits. Enough such judgments, and their profits evaporate, prompting a search for a new means of livelihood.

While I may or may not agree with his methods, his actions are taking money out of the pockets of spammers; which, given their model, can only be a good thing.

If more people did what he's doing, we would definitely see much lesser spam.



I completely agree with your sentiment.

The winning quote from this article is: "His courtroom foes contend that Balsam is one of many sole practitioners unfairly exploiting anti-spam sentiments and laws. They accuse him of filing lawsuits against out-of-state companies that would rather pay a small settlement than expend the resources to fight the legal claims."

Finally, a consumer is using the same tactics that big companies with big budgets use to get startups and individuals to give up their claims. This obviously only works because Balsam is a lawyer and doesn't need to pay his legal fees. But, I am happy to see someone fighting back!


If Balsam accepted donations, I'd be sending him $25 right now, hopefully joined by 10 million other people.


It doesn't seem like he needs donations. It sounds like he needs lawyers and paralegals to expand to a proper firm, and it would be self-sustaining.


don't you think that a bunch of donations might be useful for this? call it crowdsourced vc if that makes it easier to understand.


Do not do that, he might retire... 1/2 :-)


Perhaps what is needed is a non-profit devoted to suing spammers. Then we could donate to that organization.


I'm sure this Dan guy works harder at fighting SPAM given his profit incentive.


I would think having a profit incentive means choosing the easy, low-hanging fruit rather than the hard cases that would take a lot of time and reduce the amount of potential profit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: