Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I bought one of the first Kindles and loaded it up with a hundred DRM-liberated ebooks and read it avidly. Since then, phones have gotten bigger screens with higher pixel density and longer battery life, and my Kindle now sits is a drawer unused. The best ebook reader is the one you have on you.


Higher battery life? The Kindle battery lasts much longer than a phone with the backlight off and in airplane mode.

But again, even if a phone could be used as an ereader, my point is that for most people it is likely not. Even for bibliophiles, they might not get so much reading done on a phone due to the distractions that phones bring.


These days, so long as the battery lasts all day (it does, using it as an ebook reader), that sufficient for a phone. Longer is better, but I always have a charger on me, a spare battery for emergencies when traveling, and a charging pad next to my bed at home.

> they might not get so much reading done on a phone due to the distractions that phones bring.

Short of notifications, there are no distractions on my phone when reading a book. No clock, no battery indicator, no nothing. If I really want to read, I can just go into DND mode, and even notifications have gone away.


I meant battery life is now longer on phones than it used to be on phones, assuming you're using it as an ebook reader, which means no radios.


That still can't be compared to an average eReader, whose battery lasts for weeks.

I charge mine every two or three weeks (about an hour of usage per day).


Of course it can be compared.


e-ink is still vastly superior for reading than any phone screen, IMO. The experience seems completely incomparable.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: